A Trump legal challenge may put affordable college access at risk in California

California’s AB 540 faces a court test

College costs can change a life before the first class even begins. California’s AB 540 tuition exemption now faces a federal lawsuit that could change what many students pay at public colleges and universities if the government ultimately wins.

The Trump administration argues that California gives an unlawful benefit to students without legal immigration status. California says AB 540 is based on school attendance and graduation, not residency, and is also available to qualifying United States citizens from other states.

California Dream Act aid is challenged

California’s official Dream Act helps eligible students apply for state financial aid, even when they cannot receive federal aid due to their immigration status. The Justice Department’s lawsuit challenges California’s in-state tuition benefits and related state financial aid for eligible undocumented students.

Losing both protections could create a double hit. Affected students might face much higher nonresident tuition charges while also losing grants that currently help cover tuition, books, transportation, food, and other basic college expenses each year in California.

AB 540 has shaped access for decades

California’s official AB 540 policy has helped eligible students avoid nonresident tuition since 2001. To qualify, students generally must complete required years of schooling in California, earn a diploma or equivalent, and submit an affidavit to their college.

The rule does not automatically give every undocumented student lower tuition. Applicants must satisfy detailed education requirements, and qualifying United States citizens and other nonresidents may use the same exemption, a point central to California’s defense in the federal case statewide.

A judge will decide what comes next

The lawsuit was filed in federal court in California’s Eastern District in November 2025. California asked the federal court to dismiss the case, arguing that the government has not shown that the state’s laws violate federal requirements.

A dismissal could end the case at this stage, although an appeal may follow. If the judge allows the case to continue, both sides could move toward deeper legal arguments, evidence gathering, and eventually a later ruling on the policies themselves.

Community college costs could soar

California community colleges charge residents $46 per unit, keeping tuition relatively low for students building job skills, earning certificates, or preparing to transfer. Students who lose an AB 540 exemption could instead face each district’s much higher nonresident tuition and fees.

For a full course load, that gap can reach thousands of dollars in one year. Students with limited family income may take fewer classes, work longer hours, delay graduation, or leave college if the new costs become unaffordable.

Little-known fact: California operates 116 community colleges, forming the nation’s largest public higher-education system.

UC students face a much larger bill

At the University of California, nonresidents pay regular systemwide tuition plus a large supplemental charge. AB 540 students who qualify for the exemption currently avoid that extra amount and generally pay the same systemwide tuition as California residents.

If the exemption is struck down, affected students could see annual charges rise by tens of thousands of dollars, depending on campus fees and the year of enrollment. Housing, food, transportation, and books would still be added to that larger tuition bill each year.

Fun fact: The University of California opened its first campus in Berkeley in 1869.

CSU affordability could also change

California State University serves hundreds of thousands of students across 23 campuses, many of them commuters, transfer students, and first-generation collegegoers. Eligible AB 540 students currently pay resident tuition rather than the higher charges applied to nonresident students.

Removing that exemption would raise costs for affected students even if CSU remains less expensive than many four-year options. Families may need larger loans, additional jobs, or fewer enrolled units, all of which can make completing a degree financially harder and slower.

State aid fills a federal funding gap

Undocumented students generally cannot receive federal Pell Grants or federal student loans. California’s Dream Act application provides eligible students with a path to state programs, including Cal Grants and certain campus-based aid, when they meet the financial and academic requirements.

That support can determine whether tuition is manageable at all. Even students who keep an in-state rate may struggle without grants, because college costs also include rent, meals, technology, transportation, health expenses, and time away from paid work each semester statewide today.

The federal case centers on fairness

The Justice Department relies on a 1996 federal law concerning postsecondary education benefits for people without lawful immigration status. It argues that California cannot offer favorable tuition based on state residence unless the same benefit is available to United States citizens nationwide.

California disputes that description. State lawyers say AB 540 eligibility rests on attending and completing school in California rather than legal residence, and qualifying citizens from outside California can receive the exemption when they meet the same requirements statewide.

California points to an earlier win

AB 540 has faced a major legal challenge before. In 2010, the California Supreme Court upheld the law in Martinez v. Regents of the University of California, finding that its tuition exemption was tied to school attendance rather than California residence.

The current federal lawsuit asks a federal court to reach a different conclusion about federal law. California views the earlier decision as strong support, while Trump officials argue that the state ruling misread federal law and should not control.

Other states offer a warning

The federal government has challenged similar tuition policies in several states, showing that California is part of a broader legal fight over college-access benefits.

California has chosen a different path by defending its statutes. That means its case could produce a more detailed ruling on whether attendance-based tuition exemptions comply with federal law, potentially influencing disputes in other states that maintain comparable college-access policies nationwide.

Students may rethink college plans

A sudden tuition increase can change more than a household budget. Students may switch campuses, reduce course loads, postpone enrollment, seek private scholarships, or abandon degree plans when the cost becomes unaffordable.

Colleges could also feel the effects through lower enrollment and greater demand for emergency assistance, advising, and legal support. The uncertainty itself matters because students must make fall schedules and financial decisions before courts finish every appeal or explain how a ruling would be implemented responsibly.

For another student debt update tied to college costs, borrower pressure, and state-level changes, see why Ohio’s loan rules are drawing attention.

Current benefits remain in place

For now, California’s AB 540 exemption and Dream Act aid remain available under existing rules. The lawsuit alone does not cancel a student’s eligibility, and colleges must continue following current law unless a court issues an order changing it.

Students should rely on official campus financial aid offices and updates from the California Student Aid Commission, not online rumors. The judge’s next decision may settle only whether the case proceeds, while an outcome could take longer if either side appeals.

For another student loan update tied to repayment changes, borrowing caps, and college costs, see why Trump’s new law is reshaping the rules.

Should college access be protected when tuition rules become part of a political fight? Share your thoughts and drop a comment.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Read More From This Brand:

• Dozens of graduate programs now have a bigger federal student loan pathway
• Legal challenge grows as North Carolina joins fight over student loan overhaul
• Could this student loan fight reshape healthcare training? States say Trump’s limits could hit rural areas hardest