California faces backlash over Medicaid freeze affecting seniors and disabled people

Your money, your care, and a big dispute

Money can be confusing, especially when it involves government programs that millions of Americans rely on every single day. Right now, there is a major dispute happening between the federal government and two states over Medicaid funding.

The Trump administration recently announced it would hold back more than $1 billion in Medicaid payments to California and Minnesota. These frozen funds are meant to help pay for caregiving services that thousands of elderly and disabled residents depend on to live safely at home.

Why is the government pausing these payments?

Federal officials say they are pausing these payments because they suspect fraud in some Medicaid programs. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz both spoke about these concerns at a July 21 press conference.

Kennedy said states need to prove every dollar was spent properly before the federal government will release the funds. Oz added that the administration is taking a proactive new approach to program integrity, stopping payments before fraud happens rather than trying to recover money afterward.

Breaking down the Medicaid deferrals

California is facing a new deferral of approximately $867.5 million in federal Medicaid payments, while Minnesota has about $199 million under additional review.

Together, the latest actions exceed $1 billion. California’s new deferral follows an earlier $1.3 billion action announced in May 2026, bringing its total withheld reimbursements to roughly $2.2 billion. Minnesota’s deferrals from the past three quarters total approximately $550 million.

What services are being affected?

California’s deferrals include claims involving In-Home Supportive Services, or IHSS. The program pays caregivers to assist with daily activities such as bathing, cooking, grocery shopping and transportation to medical appointments.

Approximately 900,000 older Californians and people with disabilities rely on IHSS to remain at home. Minnesota’s deferrals separately cover 14 service areas identified as vulnerable to fraud and billing problems.

Fun fact: Between 2023 and 2025, California’s IHSS caseload increased by 17.5%, and the average hourly wage for home health workers grew from $19 to $21.

Governor Newsom fights back

California Governor Gavin Newsom did not hold back when responding to the federal freeze. He called it a recycled political stunt and said his state was being unfairly targeted for political reasons.

Newsom argued that California is actually saving taxpayer money by keeping seniors and people with disabilities out of more expensive nursing homes. He said the state’s home care program costs about $30,000 per person annually, while skilled nursing facilities can cost four to five times that amount.

Fun fact: California’s Medicaid program, known as Medi-Cal, covers more than one-third of the state’s population.

Governor Walz speaks out

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz also pushed back hard against the funding freeze. He rejected the fraud claims and suggested the administration was playing political games with people’s healthcare.

This isn’t about fraud, Walz said. It’s about cutting your healthcare so that Trump can afford the tax cuts he gave to billionaires. He also stated that the administration “is cutting more money in healthcare than they’ve prosecuted for fraud.

Real families face real uncertainty

For families such as Shannon Rosa’s, the dispute is deeply personal. California’s IHSS program allows Rosa to care for her disabled son without taking an additional job outside the home.

Rosa warned that losing this support could leave families without income, stability or a basic safety net. Caregivers could be forced to seek additional work while disabled relatives go without necessary assistance.

What is the fraud debate really about?

Federal officials claim they have spotted suspicious billing patterns and unusually high spending growth in home care programs. Oz said California’s IHSS spending went up 24 percent over the past two years, compared with 12% on average in other states.

But critics point out that spending growth does not automatically mean fraud is happening. More people want care at home instead of institutions, caregivers need better wages, and people with disabilities often require more hours of personal care services.

Are blue states being singled out?

Many observers have noticed that the funding freezes so far have focused on states with Democratic governors. California, Minnesota, and New York have all faced scrutiny, while Republican-led states have been largely spared.

The pause is the latest in a series of payment suspensions mostly in Democratic-run states, according to Reuters. University of Richmond law professor Carl Tobias called this substantially a political debate” focused on blue states.

Caregivers and families feel the strain

The uncertainty is weighing on caregivers who depend on Medicaid-funded programs for their income. Shannon Rosa said her family’s qualification process took months and involved extensive forms, multiple meetings and a home inspection by a social worker.

Rosa also questioned how applicants who speak English as a second language or have difficulty with written information manage the complicated process.

What is actually changing right now?

Medicaid benefits and eligibility have not changed yet. This is a payment pause between the federal government and states, not an immediate cut to services for individuals.

However, if the dispute drags on, state budgets could feel the strain. California and Minnesota have continued paying for services despite not receiving federal reimbursement, but that cannot continue forever.

What other states are being investigated?

CMS has sent targeted requests for Medicaid program-integrity information to California, Florida, Maine and New York. Florida is the only Republican-led state among those four. Hawaii has faced a separate federal action involving the certification of its Medicaid Fraud Control Unit.

The administration previously threatened to withhold approximately $515 million per quarter in future Medicaid matching funds from Minnesota. CMS later accepted the state’s corrective-action plan, resolving that threat as long as Minnesota implements the plan successfully.

Also check out how California felt the effects of rapidly growing Hurricane Genevieve.

Where does the dispute go from here?

Minnesota has already sued over earlier Medicaid deferrals. The court paused those proceedings for 120 days while Minnesota and CMS attempt to resolve the dispute, with a status report due September 3, 2026. Legal experts say additional court challenges are possible if the funding disputes continue.

Families and caregivers remain uncertain about the outcome. Disability advocates say repeated policy changes directly affect their income, care and everyday stability.

If you are wondering how California is handling big changes in technology and privacy, check out how California’s latest privacy law sparks a standoff with major automakers.

If you found this story helpful, give it a thumbs up or drop a comment below, we would love to hear your thoughts.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Read More From This Brand:

• Uber wants to cap what California lawyers can earn from car crash cases
• California’s push to end gas-powered car sales meets fresh public skepticism
• California moves closer to “Leno’s Law” as qualifying collector cars could skip smog checks starting 2027