California’s latest privacy law sparks standoff with major automakers

California’s car sales scare ends

Imagine walking into a dealership and finding out your new car could not be sold because of a legal deadline. That was the concern many Californians faced just before July 1, 2026, after major automakers warned they might pause vehicle sales if the state did not adjust a new connected car safety law.

The feared shutdown never happened. Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 719 on June 30, giving automakers more time to meet technical requirements while keeping important protections in place for domestic violence survivors who rely on connected vehicle safety features.

Why automakers sounded the alarm

Several of the world’s biggest car companies, including General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen, Hyundai, and Ford, warned that sales could be interrupted if California’s original deadline remained in place. Their industry group argued that some required vehicle features could not be completed in time.

The warning covered both new and used vehicles sold by dealerships across California. Since the state is the nation’s largest auto market, any disruption could have affected buyers, dealers, and manufacturers across the country.

A law focused on survivor safety

The issue started with California’s SB 1394, passed in 2024 after concerns that connected vehicle technology could be used to stalk or harass people. Modern cars often allow approved users to check a vehicle’s location or control certain functions through a mobile app.

Lawmakers wanted to make sure survivors of domestic violence had a clear way to remove someone who should no longer have access. The goal was to prevent location tracking and protect personal safety through stronger digital safeguards.

When helpful technology becomes risky

Connected vehicle services make everyday life easier. Drivers can unlock doors, start engines, locate parked vehicles, and check important information using a smartphone. These features are useful when everyone with access is authorized.

Problems can arise after a relationship ends if another person still has access to the account. Someone who can view a vehicle’s location may be able to monitor another person’s daily routine, making digital access a serious safety concern instead of just a privacy issue.

A faster way to remove remote access

California’s law created a process that allows eligible drivers to ask manufacturers to remove another person’s connected vehicle access. Survivors can submit documents showing legal possession or exclusive use of the vehicle, including certain court orders.

Once the required paperwork is received, manufacturers generally have two business days to remove the other user’s access. This gives affected drivers a practical solution without forcing them to replace or stop using their vehicle.

The technical challenge behind the dispute

The biggest concern for automakers involved adding an in-vehicle control that lets drivers quickly disable connected location access. The original law required some existing connected vehicles capable of receiving software updates to support this feature by July 1, 2026.

Manufacturers said building, testing, and validating software across many brands, vehicle systems, and model years takes significant time. They argued the schedule was too short, even though they supported the law’s safety goals.

Automakers backed the goal

Car companies said they had already created online tools that allow survivors to request the removal of another person’s connected service access. Their disagreement centered on the timeline for adding new in-vehicle controls, not the purpose of the law itself.

Industry representatives asked lawmakers for additional time to finish the engineering work. Their position was that the protections should stay in place while manufacturers completed the required technology safely and correctly.

Sales were never officially stopped

California never ordered dealerships to close or banned the sale of vehicles. Instead, automakers warned they might voluntarily pause sales because they feared selling vehicles that would not meet the legal requirements after the deadline.

That distinction mattered because no official shutdown ever took effect. Even so, the possibility created uncertainty for dealerships, buyers, lenders, and manufacturers that were preparing for the July 1 deadline.

California’s influence reaches nationwide

California accounts for about one out of every ten vehicle sales in the United States. Because of its size, changes in the state’s automotive rules often influence how vehicles are designed and sold across the country.

Many manufacturers prefer building one system that meets broad requirements instead of creating different versions for individual states. That is one reason California’s connected vehicle regulations attracted attention far beyond its own borders.

Fun fact: California has been the largest U.S. auto market for decades, accounting for about 10% of all new vehicle sales nationwide.

The deadline changed just in time

Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 719 on June 30, 2026, one day before the original compliance deadline. The updated law delayed certain technical requirements and removed the immediate conflict that had prompted automakers to warn about possible sales interruptions.

The revised measure did not eliminate the protections for survivors. Instead, it introduced a phased schedule that gives manufacturers more time to develop, test, and install the required connected vehicle features.

New rules depend on model year

The updated law now follows a model year-based timeline. Model-year 2027 and older vehicles must receive the in-vehicle location shutoff mechanism by July 1, 2027, unless installation is technologically infeasible. Model-year 2028 through 2030 vehicles must receive it as soon as practicable after sale, subject to the same exception.

Beginning with model year 2031, covered vehicles must include an in-vehicle location shutoff mechanism and a clear indicator showing whether connected location access is enabled.

Little-known fact: California law requires a prominent “HOW TO DISCONNECT REMOTE VEHICLE ACCESS” link on covered manufacturers‘ websites

Which vehicles are covered

The updated requirements apply to connected passenger vehicles, SUVs, and light trucks with a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating below 6,001 pounds. Rental company vehicles are not included under this part of the law.

The rules focus on manufacturer-provided connected services that allow users outside the vehicle to view its location or send remote commands. Vehicles without these connected features are generally not affected by these requirements.

Find out how California’s new return law is changing the balance of power between used car dealers and buyers and what it means for future vehicle purchases.

What drivers should know now

Car buyers can continue purchasing new and used vehicles in California because the expected sales disruption was avoided. Manufacturers now have a longer schedule to complete the required connected vehicle safety upgrades while dealerships continue normal operations.

Drivers who use connected vehicle apps should review who has access to their accounts, update passwords if needed, and remove anyone who no longer needs access. These simple steps can improve privacy while new safety features continue rolling out in future vehicle models.

Discover why California’s anti-stalking law prompted automakers to warn of potential vehicle sales disruptions and how the debate could affect drivers and the auto industry.

Do you think connected car safety features strike the right balance between convenience and privacy? Share your thoughts in the comments.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Read More From This Brand:

• Uber wants to cap what California lawyers can earn from car crash cases

• California’s push to end gas-powered car sales meets fresh public skepticism

• California moves closer to “Leno’s Law” as qualifying collector cars could skip smog checks starting 2027