California’s new push could make extreme highway speeding a lot riskier

California is turning extreme speeding into a fast-track problem

California is launching a new enforcement initiative targeting drivers who exceed 100 mph. The focus is speed and certainty, not just bigger fines. Instead of waiting months for court outcomes, triple-digit citations can now trigger an immediate DMV safety review.

Think of it as the state shortening the runway between a roadside stop and real consequences.

FAST is the program name, and it is designed to move quickly

The pilot is called Forwarded Actions for Speeding Tickets, shortened to FAST. It is a joint effort between the California Highway Patrol, the DMV, and transportation leaders.

When CHP cites a driver for exceeding 100 mph, the citation is automatically forwarded to the DMV Driver Safety Branch. No exceptional circumstances are required, and it does not depend on the driver already having a bad record.

The DMV review can happen even if the court case is still pending

Here is the change that makes people nervous. FAST is structured to operate independently of the court process.

That means the DMV can review the stop and your history to decide on administrative action, including suspension or revocation, even while the ticket itself is still being processed through the legal system.

This is aimed at the small slice of drivers who can do the most harm

Driving 100 mph is not a little over the limit. It is the kind of speed where a small mistake can become a life-changing crash.

State leaders frame FAST as early intervention for the worst behavior, not a blanket crackdown on everyone driving 75 in a 65 mph zone. By focusing on triple-digit citations, the program targets the end where danger spikes.

California has been issuing an eye-popping number of 100 mph tickets

The state is not launching this in a vacuum. CHP has reported issuing roughly 1,600 tickets per month for drivers going over 100 mph. In 2024, reporting cited more than 18,000 CHP citations for speeds above 100 mph statewide.

That kind of volume signals a pattern, not a rare outlier. FAST is California saying this level of speed is common enough to demand a faster response.

The safety backdrop is grim, and speeding shows up again and again

California transportation officials reported about 3,600 roadway deaths and more than 14,000 serious injuries in 2023. Those numbers are the fuel behind new enforcement. Speeding is estimated to be a factor in about a third of traffic deaths statewide.

When leaders discuss preventing irreversible harm, they are referring to the mathematical relationship between speed, crash severity, and survival.

The deterrent theory is swift and sure consequences

If you have ever wondered what changes behavior, officials are leaning on a classic idea. The strongest deterrent is not always the harshest penalty, but the fastest and most predictable one. FAST is built around that logic.

A triple-digit citation is automatically routed for DMV action, so drivers cannot assume the worst outcome is a fine and a lecture months later. The state wants consequences to be felt immediately.

Low-profile CHP vehicles are part of the same crackdown vibe

Enforcement is getting harder to spot. CHP has been deploying specially marked, low-profile patrol vehicles designed to blend into traffic. Many are Dodge Durango SUVs with subdued colors and low-profile lighting.

The point is simple. Reckless drivers behave differently when they spot a cruiser. A stealthier presence aims to catch lane weaving, road rage, and triple-digit runs in the act, not after.

Speed cameras are expanding, too, but they solve a different problem

FAST is not the same as automated speed cameras, but they share a theme. California’s speed camera pilot lets select cities test automated enforcement on high-injury corridors.

Cameras target frequent, everyday speeding that poses a threat to pedestrians and neighborhoods.

FAST targets the extreme highway end, where one driver at 110 can change multiple lives in seconds. Together, they signal California is using both tech and policy to reshape habits.

What happens after the ticket is forwarded is more case-by-case

FAST does not automatically suspend licenses on the spot. The DMV Driver Safety Branch reviews the citation, the specifics of the stop, and the driver’s history.

That review can lead to outcomes ranging from no action or a warning letter to suspension or complete revocation of your license.

The takeaway is this. If you are cited over 100 mph, you are no longer dealing with only a court date. You may face a separate administrative process.

The pilot has a clock, and the state plans to measure results

This is a pilot program, scheduled to run for at least one year. The state intends to judge it with data, not vibes.

The DMV plans to compare citations and outcomes during the pilot with those of the prior year to determine whether faster referrals alter behavior or crash trends. If the numbers look good, a pilot can become policy. If not, it may be redesigned or shelved.

Drivers still have rights, but the process can feel confusing

Administrative actions can feel abrupt when they run alongside a court case. If you are pulled into a DMV safety review, it is not the same process as a trial. Treat a 100 mph citation as two tracks. One is the court ticket.

The other is an administrative review that may involve hearings, deadlines, and paperwork. Missing the second track can be costly, even if you fight the citation.

For a lighter twist on road rules, take a look at this Texas highway where you can only drive at the speed of a funeral procession.

If you want to avoid FAST, the safest hack is painfully boring

There is no secret loophole here. The threshold that triggers FAST is straightforward, and achieving triple-digit speeds is the target behavior.

If you catch yourself treating empty freeway lanes like a game, assume enforcement has gotten less visible and faster to respond.

Give yourself more time, use cruise control wisely, and remember your margin for error shrinks fast above 80, then collapses above 100. California wants that lesson to stick.

For a fascinating contrast in how states handle speed, you can read about the Arizona bill that would remove daytime speed limits on some rural interstates.

What do you think about California’s new push to make extreme highway speeding a lot riskier? Please share your thoughts and drop a comment.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Read More From This Brand:

• Why the Redwood Highway can feel completely isolated
• One Northern California highway has a deadly reputation, study finds
• Driverless taxis now allowed on freeways in SF, Phoenix, and LA