Debate over empty homes and housing affordability continues in San Diego

San Diego says no to vacant home tax

A beach house in San Diego sounds like a dream for many people. Ocean views, sunny weather, and quiet neighborhoods make the city one of the most desirable places in America.

San Diego voters rejected Measure A, a proposed “Non-Primary Homes Tax” targeting residential properties left vacant for more than 182 days per year.

Supporters believed it could help free up housing, while critics argued it would create more problems than solutions. The debate sparked strong opinions across the city.

A tax aimed at empty second homes

Measure A focused on second homes that sit vacant for more than half the year. The measure proposed an $8,000 annual tax in 2027 on non-primary homes vacant more than 182 days, increasing to $10,000 in later years with inflation adjustments.

The amount was set to increase to $10,000 in 2028 and continue rising later with inflation. Corporate owners could have paid even higher fees under the proposal. Backers of the measure said the goal was simple. They wanted to push owners to either rent out unused homes or put them on the market for sale.

Voters rejected the proposal

When election results started coming in, it quickly became clear that many voters were not convinced. Early returns showed Measure A trailing by roughly 58% “No” to 42% “Yes,” with hundreds of thousands of ballots still uncounted at the time.

The outcome marked a major setback for supporters who had spent months promoting the tax plan. Labor unions and housing groups had campaigned heavily for the measure.

Why housing costs stay so high

San Diego has become one of the most expensive housing markets in the country. The median price for a single-family home now sits above $1 million. Many younger buyers feel locked out of the market, while renters continue dealing with rising monthly costs. Limited supply has remained a major issue across the city.

Supporters argued the tax would incentivize owners of vacant homes to rent out or sell properties, increasing housing availability in a constrained market. They argued some wealthy owners rarely use their properties while local workers struggle to find housing nearby.

Little-known fact: The measure was estimated to affect about 1% of San Diego homes, roughly 5,100 properties.

Supporters saw a bigger opportunity

Housing groups supporting Measure A hoped the tax would encourage change without forcing anyone to sell property. Their argument centered on incentives. If owners faced a large yearly fee, some might decide renting out their homes made more financial sense.

Backers also pointed to cities around the world that have explored similar taxes on vacant properties. San Diego faced a significant budget shortfall exceeding $100 million, prompting discussions of cuts and new revenue sources.

Critics questioned the real goal

Opponents of Measure A argued the plan was less about housing and more about money. San Diego has faced a major budget shortfall totaling more than $100 million. City leaders have discussed possible workforce cuts and spending reductions to close the gap.

Another concern centered on where the money would go. Independent estimates projected roughly $24 million annually in revenue from the measure.

That detail frustrated many voters who might have supported the measure if the funds had been locked into affordable housing projects or rental assistance programs.

How much money was expected

San Diego’s independent budget analyst estimated the tax could have generated between $9.2 million and $21.4 million during its first year. Approximately 5,000–5,140 vacant non-primary residences were estimated to fall under the tax.

Supporters said the extra money could help city finances while also encouraging better use of housing. Critics argued the projected revenue showed the measure was mostly a financial tool instead of a housing fix.

Vacation homes became a hot topic

Second homes have become increasingly common in popular coastal cities. Some buyers use these properties only during holidays or short vacations. Others hold them as investments while waiting for property values to rise.

Measure A brought that tension into public view. Some jurisdictions, including parts of California and proposals in other states, have explored or implemented vacancy-related property taxes, but policies vary widely.

Fun fact: San Diego County has one of the highest numbers of second homes in California, largely driven by its coastal location and year-round tourism appeal.

Other places are trying similar ideas

San Diego is not the only place exploring taxes tied to second homes. In New York, state lawmakers recently approved a budget that includes taxes on luxury second homes valued above $5 million.

These policies remain controversial because results can vary widely from one city to another. Some communities report small increases in available rentals, while others see little measurable change.

Homeowners worried about penalties

Opponents argued the measure could be difficult to administer and may raise privacy and compliance concerns for homeowners. Questions surfaced about seasonal residents, inherited family homes, and owners who split time between multiple properties.

There were also concerns about enforcement. Tracking how long homes remain empty can be complicated. Opponents argued the city might spend large amounts of time and money investigating property use.

The city still faces tough choices

Although Measure A failed, San Diego’s housing challenges have not disappeared. Leaders still face pressure to increase housing supply and deal with affordability concerns. Renters continue searching for relief as prices remain high across many neighborhoods.

Some housing advocates now expect officials to focus more heavily on building new apartments and speeding up development approvals. Others believe stronger tenant protections could return to the spotlight.

What this vote could signal

The rejection of Measure A may signal that voters want different approaches to housing problems. Many residents agree affordability is a serious issue, yet they may prefer solutions that avoid creating new taxes.

The vote suggests skepticism toward vacancy-based housing taxes despite widespread concern about affordability. This vote suggests that proposals targeting second homes may face strong resistance unless voters clearly see direct benefits tied to affordable housing improvements.

Why are San Diego voters considering an $8,000 tax on homes left vacant for 183 days? Discover how the proposal aims to address housing shortages and unused property concerns.

A conversation that is not ending

San Diego’s beaches, neighborhoods, and warm weather continue attracting buyers from around the country. That popularity keeps demand high and places pressure on the local housing market year after year.

Housing affordability remains a major issue in San Diego following the Measure A rejection. For some people, second homes represent personal success and investment. For others, empty homes symbolize missed opportunities for families needing a place to live.

Why are urban planners looking to historic European models for San Francisco’s housing challenges? Learn how old-world policy ideas are shaping modern solutions to the city’s housing crisis.

If San Diego’s housing market keeps changing like this, what solution do you think actually works best for affordability? Let us know and don’t forget to leave a like.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Read More From This Brand:

• Mayor Lurie starts sending layoff notices in San Francisco as the city tries to narrow its deficit
• Groups push local water solutions as Southern California weighs plans beyond the Delta tunnel
• Customer backlash grows over alleged pro-Trump ties at Roberto’s Taco Shop