Newsom’s plan to restructure control of California’s education department reaches a key vote stage

California schools get a new boss

Governor Gavin Newsom backed a budget deal that changes who runs California’s public schools. For more than a century, California’s elected state superintendent helped lead the California Department of Education. Under the new law, executive and administrative control shifts to an education commissioner appointed by the governor and confirmed by the state Senate.

This is one of the biggest education governance changes in state history. Supporters say it fixes a fragmented system where authority is split across offices. Opponents call it an undemocratic power grab. Either way, millions of California families could feel the effects when the change takes effect on January 15, 2027.

Why change something so old?

Governor Gavin Newsom’s plan to shift control of the California Department of Education isn’t coming out of nowhere. Studies have recommended this change for decades. Right now, California is one of only 12 states where voters elect the person who runs the education department.

The current system splits authority between the governor and the superintendent. The governor creates programs, but the superintendent implements them. Supporters say this leads to confusion and poor oversight.

The superintendent gets a new job

Under Governor Gavin Newsom’s plan, the state superintendent won’t manage the California Department of Education anymore. Instead, the superintendent becomes something like an independent watchdog.

The superintendent also gets new voting roles on the State Board of Education and the community college board. Supporters say this gives the elected official more influence, not less. But opponents argue it’s a demotion.

Meet the new education director

Starting January 15, 2027, a new position called the education commissioner takes over executive and administrative leadership of the California Department of Education. The governor appoints this person, and the state Senate confirms them.

This is a major shift from how things have worked for more than a century. Supporters say it brings clearer accountability to a system long criticized as fragmented. The education commissioner will lead the department’s role in carrying out state education programs, funding rules and student testing systems.

Teachers’ union fights back hard

The California Teachers Association, one of the state’s most powerful political groups, isn’t happy about this change. They say it’s undemocratic and disrespects voters who just participated in the June primary election.

The union has a lot of influence. For decades, the CTA has helped elect state superintendents who support their agenda. Under the new system, the union would have less direct say over who runs the department.

Fun fact: The CTA has 310,000 members, making it one of the largest teachers’ unions in the country. Their political endorsements have helped determine who becomes state superintendent for decades.

What are education experts saying?

The Stanford-based Policy Analysis for California Education group released a detailed report in December 2025 on California’s school governance system. The report said the state’s system is fragmented, complex and often unclear about who is responsible for results.

PACE Executive Director Lupita Cortez Alcalá later called the new law one of the most significant education governance reforms in California’s history. She praised the change for recognizing that improving education requires clearer leadership, not just more money.

Fun fact: The PACE report was 94 pages long and involved faculty from Stanford, UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UCLA, and USC, some of the top education researchers in the country.

The compromise that made it happen

The final deal isn’t exactly what Newsom originally proposed. Two Democratic Assembly members from San Diego, Darshana Patel and David Alvarez, wrote their own version of the bill.

The compromise also expands the State Board of Education from 11 to 13 members. The Senate president and Assembly speaker each get to appoint one new member. This gives lawmakers more influence over education policy.

Will school programs work better?

Supporters say the change will make school programs work better. They argue California has often created major education initiatives without one clear official responsible for implementation, oversight and results. Education researchers have described the state’s governance system as fragmented and hard to navigate.

Under the new system, the education commissioner will be responsible for running the California Department of Education. Supporters believe clearer leadership will improve follow-through on state programs. Opponents worry that a political appointee could prioritize the governor’s agenda over what local schools and students need.

Candidates for superintendent say no

The two candidates running for state superintendent in November both oppose this reform. Sonja Shaw from Chino Valley Unified and Richard Barrera from San Diego Unified both want to keep the current system.

Barrera said he needs to review the details, but remains focused on bringing people together around fully funded schools. Shaw called the bill an unprecedented, unconstitutional power grab. Both candidates say voters’ voices matter, and this change silences them.

The budget deal that made this possible

This education reform was included in California’s 2026-27 budget package. Newsom and legislative leaders announced the agreement on June 26, 2026, just days before the new fiscal year began on July 1. The budget process gave the proposal a faster path than a stand-alone policy bill would normally receive.

State leaders said the budget was balanced with no deficit this fiscal year or next. It includes funding for universal free school meals, universal transitional kindergarten and major new investments for students with disabilities. The education governance change quickly became one of the most debated pieces of the package.

What do voters actually think?

The debate has focused on whether voters will still have meaningful influence over state education leadership. Californians voted in the June 2026 primary for state superintendent before the governance change became final.

Supporters argue voters will still choose the superintendent, who will serve as an independent advocate and evaluator. Opponents say the elected office is being weakened while keeping the same title. They argue voters are losing a direct say over who runs the California Department of Education.

More changes could be coming

This reform is only the first phase of a larger governance review. By June 30, 2027, the education commissioner must submit an interim report on the process for developing further recommendations. A final report with findings and recommendations is due by October 1, 2027.

Those recommendations could affect county offices of education, the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence and other parts of the state’s education oversight system. Supporters see the effort as a long-overdue modernization that could lead to bigger changes in how California schools are managed.

If you want to see how other policy and accountability debates are unfolding in California right now, check out how Newsom’s charity reporting fine raises new trust questions for a closer look at what’s driving the discussion.

What does it mean for California families?

For most parents and students, daily life at school probably won’t change overnight. Teachers will still teach, kids will still learn, and principals will still run their schools. The changes affect the people in Sacramento who make big decisions about funding, policies, and programs.

The real question is whether this reform will actually improve education outcomes. Supporters believe clearer leadership will lead to better program implementation. Opponents fear political interference and less accountability.

If you want to see how California’s leadership is responding to broader economic pressures beyond education, check out how Gavin Newsom steps in as California tech layoffs surge for a closer look at what’s happening next.

Do you think California schools will run better under this new system? We’d love to hear your take; share your opinion in the comments, and don’t forget to hit that like button.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Read More From This Brand:

• Gavin Newsom faces criticism over $114 million Butterfly Bridge project in California
• Inside the backlash Gavin Newsom faced after promoting California to BTS fans online
• Gavin Newsom says California has no deficit, but the $350 billion price tag is drawing fire