Tech Moguls Are Fleeing California to Dodge a $100 Billion Wealth Tax

January 1 Deadline Sparked Year-End Exodus

California’s richest residents just had the most expensive New Year’s Eve of their lives.

A proposed ballot measure would slap a one-time 5% tax on anyone worth more than $1 billion who lived in the state on January 1, 2026.

The catch is that the tax applies retroactively, meaning billionaires who stayed past midnight are locked in even though voters will not decide until November.

That sent tech titans scrambling for the exits in December, filing business documents in Florida, signing office leases in Texas, and quietly updating their voter registrations before the clock struck twelve.

Peter Thiel Opens Miami Office on New Years Eve

Thiel Capital announced on December 31 that it opened a new office in Miami’s Wynwood neighborhood. The lease was signed in December 2025, and the space will complement existing operations in Los Angeles.

Thiel has maintained a personal residence in Miami since 2020, and his venture capital firm Founders Fund has had an office there since February 2021.

He also registered to vote in Florida and has obtained New Zealand citizenship while exploring citizenship in Malta.

For a billionaire worth around $27.5 billion, the timing was not coincidental.

Larry Page Files Florida Business Documents

Google co-founder Larry Page has discussed leaving California by the end of the year, according to two people briefed on the talks.

In mid-December, three limited liability companies associated with Page filed documents to incorporate in Florida.

Page, who co-founded Google in 1998 as a Stanford student, has kept a low profile since stepping down from day-to-day management at Alphabet in 2019.

His family office head has recently been spending time in Miami. With a net worth estimated at $258 billion to $270 billion, Page could face a tax bill exceeding $12 billion if he stayed.

David Sacks Relocates to Austin in December

Craft Ventures announced on December 31 that it opened a new office in Austin, Texas, having signed a lease earlier that month. Co-founder David Sacks relocated to Austin in December and will work from the new office.

Sacks, who serves as President Trump’s AI and cryptocurrency advisor, did not mention the wealth tax in his announcement. But his social media posts made his views clear.

He declared that Miami will replace New York as the finance capital and Austin will replace San Francisco as the tech capital “as a response to socialism.

What the Tax Would Actually Cost

The proposed 2026 Billionaire Tax Act would impose a one-time 5% levy on net worth exceeding $1 billion.

For Page, whose net worth is estimated at $258 billion, the measure could result in a tax of more than $12 billion.

Thiel, worth approximately $27. 5 billion, could owe more than $1.2 billion. Taxpayers would have the option to spread payments over five years.

The tax would apply to stocks, businesses, and other investments, though real estate, pensions, and retirement accounts would be excluded.

The Healthcare Union Behind the Measure

The proposal is sponsored by the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, a powerful union with more than 120,000 members.

The union says California has about 200 billionaires who collectively hold $2 trillion in wealth. About 90% of the revenue would go toward healthcare services, with the rest funding education and food assistance.

Supporters argue the money would offset federal cuts to Medicaid that could cost California tens of billions annually.

The union estimates the tax could raise $100 billion in revenue.

Palmer Luckey Says Founders Would Be Crushed

Palmer Luckey, co-founder of defense tech startup Anduril, warned the tax would force founders to sell big pieces of their companies.

He explained that he made his money from his first company, paid hundreds of millions in taxes, then used the remainder to start Anduril, which now employs 6,000 people.

“One market correction, nationalization event, or prohibition of divestiture and I am screwed for life,” Luckey posted on social media.

His concern centers on founders whose wealth is tied up in private company stock they cannot easily sell to pay a massive tax bill.

Why Leaving California Is Harder Than It Sounds

Moving assets and residency can be difficult because billionaires tend to have deep roots and wealth tied up locally.

California’s tax agency is known to be aggressive and may factor in the location of bank accounts, investments, and voter registration.

The Franchise Tax Board examines where your spouse and children live, where your kids go to school, where your doctors are, where your car is registered, and how many days you spend in the state.

A Miami real estate agent said five California billionaires recently contacted him about relocating to Florida, adding that if the measure fails, some may move back.

Gavin Newsom Opposes His Own States Proposal

Governor Gavin Newsom said he is opposed to the tax proposal. “You can’t isolate yourself from the 49 other states.

We’re in a competitive environment. You’ve got to be pragmatic about it,” Newsom said at a conference in December.

He has begun raising money for a committee to oppose the ballot measure. Despite his opposition, the governor cannot stop an initiative that qualifies for the ballot.

Voters will have the final say, and Newsom can only try to persuade them.

The 875,000 Signatures Standing in the Way

The measure needs to collect about 875,000 valid voter signatures to qualify for the November 2026 ballot.

Proponents have a maximum of 180 days to gather those signatures after the initiative completes its review process.

If qualified, the initiative would only require a simple majority vote to pass.

The signature threshold represents roughly 4% of California’s registered voters, an achievable but substantial hurdle for any ballot campaign.

Constitutional Challenges Are Already Brewing

The tax would be retroactive because the residency date of January 1, 2026 precedes when the initiative can be enacted after the November 2026 election.

Taxpayers could argue this violates due process protections, especially since California has never had a wealth tax before.

Critics also claim the measure could violate the constitutional right to interstate travel by penalizing anyone who lived in California even briefly.

Others argue it represents an unconstitutional bill of attainder because it singles out roughly 200 specific individuals for punishment without trial.

The Billionaires Have Made Their Choice

The tech titans who built their fortunes in California are now betting against it. They have signed leases, filed paperwork, and crossed state lines before the deadline.

Whether the measure passes, fails, or gets struck down in court, the message is clear.

Supporters argue that leaving after January 1, 2026 will not allow billionaires to avoid the tax anyway because residency is already largely set.

But for those who got out before midnight, the gamble was worth taking. A few days of packing could save them billions.

This article was created with AI assistance and human editing.

Read more from this brand:

• California Students Form Human Swastika and Post Hitlers Genocide Threat Online
• This IRS Loophole Could Save You Thousands on Student Loan Forgiveness Taxes
• Driverless taxis now allowed on freeways in SF, Phoenix, and LA