Illinois governor bills the White House $8.7 billion for tariff refunds

Pritzker demands refunds for Illinois families

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker sent President Trump a letter and invoice on Feb. 20, 2026, demanding about $8.68 billion in tariff refunds.

The invoice broke down to about $1,700 per household across more than 5.1 million Illinois homes. It arrived marked “Past Due – Delinquent” and directed payment to “the working families of Illinois.”

Pritzker wrote that the tariffs had driven up grocery prices and hurt farmers, and he warned of further action if the administration ignored the demand.

The letter came from his campaign

Pritzker did not send the letter through the Illinois state government. It came from his gubernatorial campaign office.

That detail matters because Pritzker is running for a third term and is widely seen as a possible 2028 presidential contender.

The move followed his State of the State address days earlier, where he said the Trump administration had cost Illinois about $8.4 billion in withheld or canceled federal funding.

Pritzker has been one of the most outspoken Democratic critics of Trump.

The Supreme Court struck down Trump’s tariffs

The invoice landed the same day the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the president cannot use a law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump.

Two of Trump’s own appointees, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, sided with the majority. The court said the power to impose tariffs belongs to Congress, not the president.

The court stayed silent on refunds

The ruling struck down the tariffs but did not say whether the government must refund money it already collected.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh flagged this gap in his dissent, warning that refunding billions would hit the U.S. Treasury hard. Lower courts and U.S. Customs and Border Protection will likely sort out the refund question.

That leaves a huge unanswered issue for businesses that paid tariffs and families who felt the price increases.

Customs already collected about $133 billion

The numbers are staggering. U.S. Customs and Border Protection had collected about $133 billion in IEEPA tariffs as of mid-December 2025.

The Penn Wharton Budget Model projects total refund claims could reach about $175 billion.

Hundreds of companies, including major retailers like Costco, had already filed lawsuits seeking refunds before the ruling came down.

Trade lawyers say importers will likely get money back, but the process could take 12 to 18 months.

Families probably won’t see direct checks

Here is the part most people will not like. Legal experts say tariff refunds would go to the importers who paid the duties, not to everyday shoppers.

Consumers paid more when companies passed those costs along, but there is no legal path for families to reclaim that money. Sen. Elizabeth Warren warned that big corporations could sue for refunds and keep the savings.

Pritzker’s $1,700-per-household figure is a political estimate. The Yale Budget Lab independently put the per-household burden at about $1,600.

White House fires back at Pritzker

The White House did not take the invoice quietly. Spokesman Kush Desai responded with personal criticism, saying Pritzker should focus on his own state’s taxes and regulations instead of chasing headlines.

President Trump called the Supreme Court ruling “defective” during a press conference. He said refund disputes would likely drag on through the courts for years.

The back-and-forth fits a pattern of personal and political clashes between the two.

Other Democratic governors pile on

Pritzker was not alone. California Gov. Gavin Newsom called for immediate refunds with interest, saying every unlawfully taken dollar must come back.

California was the first state to sue over Trump’s IEEPA tariffs, filing back in April 2025. Nevada Treasurer Zach Conine submitted a $2.1 billion payment request to the federal government.

These moves signal a coordinated push by Democratic officials, though none of them carry legal force on their own.

New bill would force automatic refunds

Rep. Steven Horsford of Nevada and Rep. Janelle Bynum of Oregon introduced the RELIEF Act on the same day as the ruling.

The bill would require U.S. Customs and Border Protection to automatically refund tariffs collected under IEEPA since Jan. 1, 2025. Refunds would go out within 90 days, with no individual applications needed.

The goal is to help small businesses that cannot afford years of lawsuits. The bill faces long odds in the Republican-controlled House and Senate.

Trump moved fast to replace the tariffs

Hours after the ruling, Trump signed a proclamation imposing a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The next day, Feb. 21, he raised it to 15%, the maximum that the law allows.

Section 122 tariffs expire after 150 days unless Congress extends them. Tariffs under other laws, like those on steel and aluminum, remain in place.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the replacement tariffs would keep tariff revenue roughly the same in 2026.

Prices drop some but tariffs remain

Even with the IEEPA tariffs gone, Americans still face tariffs under other laws.

The average tariff rate on imports drops from about 17% to about 7%, according to BMO Capital Markets. The Yale Budget Lab found the remaining tariffs still hit lower-income households harder.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that U.S. businesses and consumers absorbed nearly 90% of tariff costs in 2025.

Any refunds that happen will go to businesses first, and whether those savings reach shoppers remains unclear.

The refund process could take years

Trade lawyers say the refund process will likely run through the Court of International Trade in New York and U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

There is precedent: in the 1990s, courts set up a refund system after striking down an unconstitutional fee on exports.

But no court has handled anything at this scale, with thousands of importers and tens of billions of dollars involved. Trump himself said the process may need to drag on through litigation for years.

This article was created with AI assistance and human editing.

Read more from this brand:

• US Small Businesses Paying $25,000 Extra a Month Due to Tariffs
• Trump’s Swiss tariff story may have given his Supreme Court opponents a gift
• American households are paying the literal price for Trump’s tariffs – here’s how much