Minnesota can now freeze a scammer’s access to your elderly parent’s bank account in hours

New law targets financial exploitation fast

Minnesota now gives families a quicker way to stop scammers from draining a loved one’s bank account.

A new state law took effect on Jan. 1, 2026, letting courts freeze assets, block contact with alleged scammers, and issue protection orders for vulnerable adults.

Before this, families had to pursue emergency conservatorships, a slower process that could take days. That gave fraudsters time to move money out of reach.

Minnesota is only the second state, after Florida, to create this kind of fast-track civil tool.

Bipartisan group pushed the bill forward

Gov. Tim Walz signed the bill, SF 2146, on May 23, 2025. A bipartisan group of state senators authored it, including Westlin, Utke, Maye-Quade, and Latz.

The idea started with two Minnesota attorneys. Jill Sauber, an elder law attorney in Eden Prairie, and Elizabeth Wrobel of St. Paul brought the concept to Sen. Bonnie Westlin in 2024.

Sauber said she kept seeing more scams and exploitation in her practice. The law follows the model Florida already had on the books.

Who qualifies as a vulnerable adult

Under Minnesota law, a vulnerable adult is anyone 18 or older who can’t fully care for themselves or protect themselves from harm because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

That also includes adults living in licensed care facilities or getting professional care services.

So the law covers not just older people in nursing homes or assisted living, but also younger adults with disabilities who depend on others for daily support.

Exploitation reports keep climbing in Minnesota

The numbers tell a troubling story. Reports of vulnerable adult maltreatment in Minnesota jumped about 20% from 2021 to 2024, according to the Minnesota Department of Human Services.

Financial exploitation claims alone rose roughly 22% over that same stretch.

The state’s Vulnerable Adult Maltreatment Dashboard showed total reports growing from around 55,000 to more than 66,000.

Meanwhile, the Minnesota Department of Commerce reported protecting over $8 million in funds in 2024.

Nationwide fraud losses hit record highs

The problem goes well beyond Minnesota. The FTC reported that adults 60 and older lost about $2.4 billion to fraud in 2024, up from around $600 million in 2020.

Because most fraud never gets reported, the FTC estimates the real cost to older Americans could reach as high as $81.5 billion.

Total consumer fraud losses across all ages hit a record $12.5 billion in 2024, about a 25% jump from the year before. Cases involving losses over $100,000 made up roughly 68% of all money lost by older adults.

Several groups can file a petition

The law doesn’t limit who can seek help. A vulnerable adult facing financial exploitation can file a petition directly.

So can a guardian, a conservator, or any person or organization acting on the adult’s behalf with their consent. Someone filing for emergency conservatorship can also use this process at the same time.

There are no residency requirements, and courts must treat these cases as a priority on their docket.

Courts can freeze accounts and block contact

Judges have real power under this law. They can freeze bank accounts and assets held in the vulnerable adult’s name, or jointly with the accused.

They can also freeze lines of credit and block the accused from any direct or indirect contact with the victim.

When immediate protection is needed, courts can issue temporary ex parte orders, meaning the judge can act before the accused even knows about the case.

Courts must act within 14 days

Speed is the whole point. Once someone files a petition, the court must schedule a hearing within 14 days.

Any temporary order stays in place until that hearing, and judges can extend it further depending on the case. Filing fees are waived for both sides.

Within 24 hours of issuing an order, the court must send it to local law enforcement and the lead investigative agency. That quick turnaround is what sets this apart from older, slower options.

Violators face escalating penalties

Breaking a protection order under this law starts as a misdemeanor. A second violation within 10 years becomes a gross misdemeanor.

A third or later violation in that same window is a felony, carrying up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.

One important safeguard: anything the accused says during the protection order hearing can’t be used against them in a criminal case.

If no maltreatment report existed before the petition, the person who filed must submit one within 24 hours.

Warning signs families should watch for

Scammers follow patterns. Watch for pressure to act fast on financial decisions, especially from someone your loved one just met.

Requests for payment through wire transfers, gift cards, or cryptocurrency are red flags. Unusual withdrawals, transfers, or changes to accounts should raise concern.

A new person suddenly involved in a vulnerable adult’s finances or living situation is another warning sign. If your loved one seems confused about recent transactions or won’t talk about money, pay attention.

How to report suspected exploitation

If you suspect someone is being exploited, call the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) at 1-844-880-1574. The line runs 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

You can also contact local law enforcement if you believe a crime is happening. An elder law attorney can help with filing a petition under the new law.

You don’t need proof to make a report.

A reasonable suspicion is enough to start an investigation, and reporting and legal action can happen at the same time.

The law is new and untested so far

No court outcomes have been reported yet since the law only took effect on Jan. 1, 2026. Court forms for filing petitions are available on the Minnesota Courts website.

Supporters say the law fills a gap that left families scrambling while money disappeared. Minnesota now joins Florida as a model for other states looking at similar protections.

The law doesn’t replace existing options. It adds a faster one alongside them.

This article was created with AI assistance and human editing.

Read more from this brand:

• How French voyageurs and Native hunters built the continent’s biggest fur trading network on the Grand Portage
• Top U.S. cities likely to withstand climate change include Buffalo and Minneapolis
• The USS Minneapolis-Saint Paul Just Completed Its Final Mission: Coming Home