Kathy Hochul asks wealthy New Yorkers to come back as her 2022 Florida remark draws attention

Kathy Hochul wants New Yorkers back

State officials often note that New York relies heavily on personal income tax revenue, so leaders pay close attention when high-income residents move away. That is why her latest plea for wealthy residents to return landed at such a sharp time. It opened a fresh debate about taxes, migration, and money.

At the March 11, 2026, Politico New York Agenda Albany Summit, Hochul said New York needs high-net-worth residents to help support generous social programs. She also said people should go to Palm Beach and see who they can bring back home.

Why New York watches top earners

Kathy Hochul’s message was not just about politics. It was about how New York pays for schools, transit, health care, and other services that rely heavily on tax revenue from high-income households.

New York’s Tax Department says personal income tax is the state’s largest revenue source. That makes any talk about wealthy residents leaving more than symbolic. It turns migration into a budget issue that can affect the whole state right now for lawmakers everywhere.

The 2022 Florida quote returns

Kathy Hochul is also facing renewed attention over something she said in 2022. During the 2022 campaign, Hochul said Republicans tied to ‘the era of Trump’ should ‘jump on a bus’ to Florida, a line critics are resurfacing now.

That line is being replayed now because her tone has changed. Back then, the message was combative. Now, it is practical, with Hochul openly talking in public today about bringing wealthy New Yorkers back to strengthen the state’s tax base.

Why Palm Beach keeps coming up

Palm Beach is not just a sunny punch line in this story. It stands in for a bigger migration trend, with wealthy Northeastern residents often linked to moves into Florida during and after the pandemic years.

That matters because Florida has no personal income tax. For high earners, that can make relocation feel especially tempting. Hochul’s comments showed she knows New York is competing against that kind of financial pull every day in recent years.

Fun fact: Florida does not levy a state personal income tax, which is one reason it’s often cited as attractive to high earners.

Florida and Texas changed the math

Hochul also pointed to Texas, another state often used as a lower-tax alternative. As remote work spread, people with portable jobs gained more freedom to choose where they live without giving up high-paying careers.

That shift made tax competition harder for New York to ignore. It is no longer only a retirement story. It is also about executives, investors, and firms that can move faster than they once could across many industries nationwide after 2020.

Fun fact: Texas does not have a state individual income tax.

Remote work changed the leverage

For years, living near Manhattan was part of the deal for many finance and business jobs. Remote and hybrid work weakened that tie, giving more people the option to keep their jobs while changing their address.

Hochul said remote work changed everything, and that point is hard to miss. Once workers were no longer captive to a single location, states with lower tax burdens suddenly looked even more attractive to some households and firms.

Why rich taxpayers matter so much

This debate gets attention because a small share of taxpayers often accounts for a large share of revenue. When high earners leave, the effect can ripple through budgets much faster than raw population numbers might suggest.

That does not mean every wealthy resident is packing up. It does mean leaders watch this group closely. In a high-cost state, even modest movement at the top can become a serious fiscal concern for budget planners each year.

The politics sound very different now

What makes the story so striking is the contrast in tone. In 2022, Hochul used a fiery line aimed at political rivals. In 2026, she sounded more like a governor trying to protect the state’s long-term finances.

That shift does not erase the old remark, and critics are making sure of that. But it does show how governing can force a different message than campaigning, especially when budgets are involved once the campaign season ends.

New York still has strong draws

Taxes are only part of why people choose where to live. New York still offers unmatched finance, media, culture, education, and career networks that few states can easily copy.

That is part of Hochul’s challenge and her argument. The state wants to stay competitive without giving up the services and opportunities that make New York valuable to many families and businesses, and to ambitious workers building careers and companies across industries today.

What wealthy movers often consider

High earners do not usually focus on a single tax rate. They also consider housing costs, the business climate, estate planning, schools, travel, and whether their money can keep growing with fewer tax hits.

That is why states compete on more than weather or slogans. For affluent households, a move can be part lifestyle choice, part financial strategy, and part long-term planning for family wealth in today’s fast-moving, highly mobile economy nationwide.

This is bigger than one governor

Hochul’s comments fit into a broader national debate over how states retain residents, attract investment, and fund public programs. High-tax states often defend services and infrastructure, while low-tax states market flexibility and savings.

Neither model sells itself to everyone. But the movement of wealthy households has become a closely watched test of which approach feels more attractive to voters, businesses, investors, and lawmakers across America today.

The comeback pitch faces a test

Asking people to return is one thing. Convincing them is much harder. Anyone who left for lower costs or lower taxes will weigh that choice against what New York offers now, not what it offered years ago.

That makes Hochul’s message unusually direct. She is not only defending the state. She is making a recruitment pitch to former residents whose absence can be felt in daily tax collections and business decisions across New York.

That is why winning people back may be harder than asking them to return. See why Mamdani is proposing a 2% tax increase for high-income New Yorkers.

What this says about New York now

This story is really about pressure, memory, and math all at once. A governor is trying to hold onto a tax base, answer critics, and explain why wealthy residents still matter to the future of the state.

That is why the old Florida line still stings. It collides with a very different message today, one built around keeping New York strong enough to fund what its leaders want to preserve during tougher times now statewide.

That is why tax pressure is landing so personally for many families. See why your 2025 New York tax return could be worth more if you have young kids at home.

Do you think wealthy residents will be persuaded to return to New York now? Share your thoughts and drop a comment.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Read More From This Brand:

• High costs and taxes are pushing more people out of New York and California
• New proposal could significantly expand who pays estate taxes in New York
• New York City mayor proposes first property tax hike in 17 years