Gun Rights for Weed Users? Supreme Court Takes Up the Case

Oral Arguments Set for March 2

A federal law has banned drug users from owning guns since 1968. Now the Supreme Court will decide if that ban violates the Second Amendment.

The case centers on a Texas man who was charged with a felony after FBI agents found marijuana, cocaine, and a pistol in his home. He was never charged with drug possession.

The only crime prosecutors alleged was owning a gun while using drugs, and that single charge could reshape firearm rights for millions of Americans who use marijuana legally under state law.

FBI Raids a Texas Home

In August 2022, FBI agents searched the home of Ali Danial Hemani in Texas. They found a Glock 9mm pistol, about two ounces of marijuana, and 4.7 grams of cocaine.

The agents were reportedly investigating communications allegedly linked to Iran, but no charges came from that probe.

Instead, prosecutors charged Hemani with violating a federal law that makes it a felony for drug users to possess firearms.

He admitted to using marijuana regularly, and that admission became the basis for the entire case.

A 1968 Law With Teeth

The charge against Hemani came from Section 922(g)(3) of the Gun Control Act of 1968.

The law makes it a federal crime for anyone who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance to possess a firearm.

Marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law, which means every joint puts gun owners at legal risk. A conviction can mean up to 15 years in prison and a lifetime ban on firearm ownership.

Fifth Circuit Says No

Hemani challenged the charge on Second Amendment grounds, and a federal district court agreed to dismiss it. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that dismissal in January 2025.

The appeals court ruled that prosecutors could not prove Hemani was under the influence of drugs while possessing the firearm.

History supports laws banning intoxicated people from carrying weapons, the court said, but not laws that strip gun rights from sober people based solely on past drug use.

Trump DOJ Appeals Anyway

Despite the Trump administration’s general support for gun rights, Solicitor General D. John Sauer asked the Supreme Court to overturn the Fifth Circuit ruling.

The government argues that banning habitual drug users from possessing firearms is consistent with American history and tradition.

Sauer pointed to early American laws that disarmed habitual drunkards as a historical precedent. The restriction is temporary, he argued, because users can regain their gun rights simply by stopping their drug use.

Hunter Biden Got Convicted First

This case arrives with political baggage. Hunter Biden was convicted under the same law in June 2024 for possessing a revolver while addicted to crack cocaine.

A Delaware jury found him guilty on all three felony charges. His father, President Joe Biden, pardoned him in December 2024 before sentencing.

The pardon wiped away the conviction, but the underlying law remains on the books and continues to be enforced against others.

Bruen Rewrote the Rules

The legal battle traces back to a 2022 Supreme Court decision called New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.

That ruling established a new test for gun laws: any restriction on firearm ownership must be consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation.

The decision triggered hundreds of challenges to gun laws across the country.

Courts must now dig through colonial-era statutes and Founding-era practices to determine whether modern laws pass constitutional muster.

Millions Break This Law Daily

Survey data suggests around 20 million Americans are violating Section 922(g)(3) right now.

Federal regulations say you qualify as an unlawful user if you have used an illegal drug recently enough to indicate active engagement in such conduct.

One interpretation says a single use within the past year is enough.

Nearly one in four Americans ages 12 and older have used a controlled substance within the past year, which means tens of millions of people could be barred from owning firearms.

State Laws Say One Thing

More than half of U.S. states have legalized recreational marijuana, and 40 states allow medical use. Voters and legislatures have decided that cannabis should be legal within their borders.

But federal law does not care what states do. Marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act, classified alongside heroin and LSD.

That federal classification is what triggers the gun ban, and it applies even to people using marijuana legally under state law.

Federal Courts Cannot Agree

Lower courts are split on whether the drug user gun ban survives the Bruen test. The Fifth Circuit struck it down as applied to people not actively intoxicated.

The Eighth Circuit reached a similar conclusion in a separate case.

But other courts have upheld the law, finding it consistent with historical traditions of disarming dangerous individuals.

The Supreme Court took this case in part to resolve that disagreement and establish a clear rule for courts nationwide.

Decision Expected by Summer

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on March 2, 2026, with a decision expected by late June or early July.

If the justices side with Hemani, millions of marijuana users in legal states could reclaim their gun rights.

If they uphold the ban, the conflict between state marijuana laws and federal gun restrictions will only deepen.

Either way, the ruling will mark another milestone in the ongoing transformation of Second Amendment law that began with Bruen four years ago.

This article was created with AI assistance and human editing.

Read more from this brand:

• Trump Moves Marijuana Out of the Same Category as Heroin
• Lawyer Sues IRS to Claim Her Golden Retriever as a Tax Dependent
• Trump Tariff Revenue Falls for First Time, Threatening Debt Payoff Plan