Concert fans may finally get payback — literally — as Ticketmaster goes to trial

DOJ calls the concert industry broken

The federal government put Live Nation and Ticketmaster on trial this week, accusing them of running illegal monopolies in the concert business.

The case opened March 3 in a Manhattan courtroom, where DOJ attorney David Dahlquist told jurors the concert ticket industry is “broken” and “controlled by a monopolist.”

The DOJ, 40 state attorneys general, and Washington, D.C., all brought the lawsuit, which was first filed in May 2024. The trial could last five to six weeks.

Both sides fight over ticket fees

How much does Ticketmaster really cost fans? A New York state attorney told jurors the company keeps an average of about $7.58 per ticket sold at major concert venues.

Prosecutors say fans overpaid between $1.56 and $1.72 per ticket because of the company’s grip on the market. They pointed to competitor AXS as a benchmark for fair pricing.

Live Nation attorney David Marriott pushed back, saying Ticketmaster takes about 5% of what fans pay and clears less than $2 per ticket after costs.

The company says artists and teams set the prices, not Ticketmaster.

Market share depends on who defines it

This trial may come down to one question: how big is the market?

The government says Ticketmaster controls roughly 80% to 86% of primary ticketing at major concert venues, defined as those with at least 8,500 seats and 10 or more concerts a year. Live Nation sees it differently.

The company says its real share is closer to 40% when you count stadiums, arenas, and smaller venues.

Live Nation points to more than 20,000 live venues across the country where it handles only a small piece of the business.

Live Nation says competition is thriving

Defense attorney Marriott told jurors his company earned its spot, not through monopoly power, but through hard work.

He called the live entertainment market “more competitive than ever” and said every customer is a battle. Live Nation says it helped 159 million people see about 11,000 artists at roughly 55,000 concerts in 2025.

The defense argues the government drew the market boundaries too narrowly, which makes Ticketmaster’s share look bigger than it really is.

A 2010 merger created today’s giant

Live Nation and Ticketmaster merged in 2010 after a DOJ review.

The deal came with a consent decree meant to stop anticompetitive behavior, including a ban on punishing venues that used rival ticketing services.

But in 2019, the DOJ found Live Nation had broken those rules more than once. The government extended the decree by five and a half years and brought in an independent monitor.

Critics say the original merger approval and weak enforcement built the very problem now on trial.

Judge narrowed the case before trial

Judge Arun Subramanian trimmed the lawsuit in a Feb. 18 ruling. He threw out the claim that Live Nation holds a monopoly over national concert promotion.

He also dismissed the argument that the company’s conduct directly raised ticket prices for fans. The judge said prosecutors had not clearly defined a nationwide market for primary ticketing from the fans’ side.

But fans may still seek damages as victims of the alleged venue-facing ticketing monopoly, so the door is not fully shut.

Three claims survived for the jury

The jury will weigh three remaining claims. First, Ticketmaster keeps its grip on primary ticketing at major venues through long-term exclusive contracts.

Second, Live Nation forces artists who want to play its amphitheaters to also use Live Nation as their promoter, a practice known as “tying.”

Third, a specific ticketing deal between Live Nation and Oak View Group hurts competition. The judge wrote that a reasonable jury could find artists felt pressured into using Live Nation’s promotion services.

The defense says none of these claims justify a forced breakup.

Taylor Swift presale sparked public outrage

Prosecutors brought up the 2022 Taylor Swift Eras Tour presale meltdown to show what happens without competition. The Ticketmaster site crashed, locking millions of fans out of buying tickets.

The fallout brought Congressional hearings and a wave of public anger.

The DOJ argued Ticketmaster had not bothered to upgrade its technology because no real competitor forced it to. Live Nation blamed the crash on a cyberattack, not on any lack of competition.

Internal messages could hurt Live Nation

Prosecutors told jurors they plan to show internal Live Nation messages that mocked concertgoers. One message described Ticketmaster as taking advantage of fans.

The government also pointed to internal emails where a Ticketmaster executive allegedly admitted the company looks the other way when ticket brokers break the rules.

These communications could become some of the strongest evidence in the case. Live Nation says those messages were pulled out of context.

FTC filed its own lawsuit last year

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) brought a separate lawsuit against Live Nation and Ticketmaster in September 2025. That case accuses the companies of letting ticket brokers dodge purchase limits and drive up prices.

The FTC says Ticketmaster profits three times from the same ticket: the original sale, the resale listing, and the final resale. Live Nation asked a judge to toss the FTC case, calling it overreach.

Together, the two lawsuits mark the biggest legal threat the company has ever faced.

DOJ leadership changes add uncertainty

The trial comes at an unusual time for the DOJ. Gail Slater, who led the Antitrust Division, resigned on Feb. 12 after the White House reportedly pushed her out. Her top deputy, Mark Hamer, also left shortly before her.

At least one DOJ trial attorney working on this case has departed too. But the states say they are not going anywhere.

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti said states will press the case forward no matter what happens with federal leadership.

A breakup is possible but not guaranteed

If the jury finds Live Nation liable, the judge will decide what comes next, and that could include forcing the company to sell Ticketmaster.

But the path to a breakup got narrower after the judge dismissed the promotion monopoly claim. States want financial damages for fans, and any federal antitrust award gets automatically tripled.

Live Nation tried to settle before trial but refused to agree to a breakup, so talks fell apart. The result could change how millions of Americans buy concert tickets.

This article was created with AI assistance and human editing.

Read more from this brand:

• Pepsi, Walmart Accused of Jacking Up Soda Prices in 10-Year Scheme
• White students called a “new minority” as Trump’s DOJ takes on LA school district
• Your Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp data goes to one company — feds say that’s too much power over your life