Do most green card applicants now have to apply from outside the U.S.? A new change is reshaping the process

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

A green card can mean stability, work, family plans, and a future in the United States. Now, USCIS is at the center of a major shift that could change how many applicants move through the process.

On May 22, 2026, USCIS announced that many applicants who are in the U.S. temporarily will be expected to apply through consular processing abroad, with adjustment of status approvals limited to “extraordinary circumstances.” Supporters call it a way to tighten the system. Critics say it could separate families and disrupt jobs.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services shift

USCIS has long allowed many eligible applicants to seek adjustment of status without leaving the country. That path matters because people can often keep working, studying, or living with family while waiting.

The new change treats that inside-the-U.S. route much more narrowly. Reports say applicants may have to use consular processing in their home country unless they qualify for an exception. That could turn a legal immigration step into a major disruption to a person’s life.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services rule

USCIS says exceptions may still exist for “extraordinary circumstances.” That phrase could become one of the most important parts of the policy.

For applicants, the problem is uncertainty. People may not know whether they can stay in the U.S. while applying, or whether they must leave and wait abroad. Immigration lawyers expect confusion, delays, and possible legal challenges as the government applies the new standard.

Why this change feels big

For many families, a green card case is not just paperwork. It can decide where someone lives, whether they can keep a job, and how long they may be apart from loved ones.

The policy could affect temporary workers, students, spouses, and others who are already in the U.S. legally. If they must leave to finish the process, they may face travel costs, consular backlogs, job problems, and long waits before returning.

Fun fact: About 1.36 million people became lawful permanent residents in fiscal year 2024, according to compiled federal data summaries.

Adjustment of status explained

Adjustment of status is the process some people use to apply for a green card from inside the United States. It differs from consular processing, in which the person applies through a U.S. embassy or consulate abroad.

That difference matters because leaving the U.S. can carry risks. Some people may trigger bars, delays, or an added review depending on their case. Even when someone follows the rules, moving abroad can still affect work, school, rent, and family care.

Little-known fact: USCIS describes adjustment of status as the process of applying for lawful permanent resident status from within the United States using Form I-485.

Consular processing may grow

Consular processing is not new. Many people already apply for immigrant visas from outside the United States, then enter as lawful permanent residents after approval.

What is changing is the scale. If more people must apply abroad, U.S. consulates may face heavier demand. Applicants could also face long waits for interviews, document checks, and security reviews. For families used to living together in the U.S., that wait could feel especially hard.

Families could feel it first

Family-based immigration is a major part of the green card system. Spouses, parents, adult children, and siblings may already face long waits depending on their category and country.

If more applicants must leave during the process, family strain could grow. A parent may miss school events. A spouse may have to manage bills alone. A worker may lose income while waiting overseas. That is why critics say the policy could hit ordinary households first.

Workers and employers are watching

The change could also affect employers that rely on skilled workers already living in the U.S. Many workers on temporary visas build careers here while waiting for permanent residency.

If those workers must leave for consular processing, companies may face staffing gaps. Workers may also worry about whether they can return quickly. Critics argue the policy could make the U.S. less attractive to researchers, doctors, engineers, and other professionals who have choices in other countries.

Supporters point to enforcement

The administration says the policy can reduce the risk that denied applicants stay in the U.S. without legal status. Supporters see that as a stronger way to manage immigration control.

That argument focuses on enforcement, but the tradeoff is clear. A stricter system may be easier for the government to police, but harder for applicants who are already living, working, and following a legal process. Courts may have to decide whether the policy goes too far.

Critics expect legal fights

Immigration attorneys and advocates are already raising concerns. They argue that Congress created adjustment of status as a legal pathway and that the government cannot narrow it so sharply by policy.

Legal challenges could focus on the agency’s authority, fairness, and the way the rule is applied. If lawsuits move quickly, courts may pause or limit parts of the policy. Until then, applicants may face a confusing period where advice from a qualified immigration lawyer becomes even more important.

Backlogs could get worse

Green card waits can already stretch from months to years. The timeline depends on the category, country, paperwork, background checks, and visa availability.

Moving more cases overseas may add another layer of delay. Consulates handle many types of visas, not only green cards. If demand rises, interview slots may become harder to get. For applicants, that can mean more uncertainty. For families and employers, it can mean planning around a process with no quick answer.

The policy affects legal immigration

This change is not mainly about people crossing the border illegally. It targets people seeking lawful permanent residence, including many who are already in the U.S. through legal routes.

That distinction is why the debate is so heated. The administration says it is protecting the system from misuse. Opponents say it is deliberately making legal immigration harder. For the public, the key question is whether stricter processing creates order or simply adds hardship for people trying to follow the rules.

For another immigration policy fight affecting legal status and public benefits, find out more about why GOP lawmakers want to block green cards for immigrants who use Medicaid or food stamps.

What applicants should watch

Applicants should watch for official USCIS guidance, court orders, and practical instructions from consulates. They should also be careful before leaving the U.S., because travel can affect some immigration cases.

The biggest unknown is how broadly “extraordinary circumstances” will be applied. A narrow reading could push many more people abroad. A wider reading could leave room for some applicants to stay. Either way, this change could reshape green card planning for families, workers, schools, and employers.

For another immigration update affecting families and long-term planning, find out more about why a sharp decline in green card approvals is raising concerns for applicants and families.

Do you think changes like this could make the green card process harder for families and workers? Share your thoughts and drop a comment.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Read More From This Brand:

• New immigration bill aims to block certain migrants from green cards, sparking nationwide policy debate
• Green card holders are now banned from small business loans in the USA
• SBA cuts off green card holders from business loans starting in March