House passes bill that could block 21 million Americans from voting

House approves SAVE America Act 218-213

The House passed the SAVE America Act on Feb. 11, 2026, by a razor-thin 218-213 vote. Every Republican backed the bill, and Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas was the only Democrat to join them.

The bill would require proof of citizenship to register to vote and photo ID to cast a ballot in all federal elections.

President Trump has made the legislation a top priority, pushing Congress to pass it before the 2026 midterms.

House Speaker Mike Johnson called the requirements common sense, comparing them to showing ID to drive or open a bank account.

What the bill would require

The bill would change how Americans register and vote in federal elections.

Anyone signing up to vote would need to show proof of citizenship, like a U.S. passport or birth certificate. In-person voters would need a valid photo ID at the polls.

Mail-in voters would need to include a copy of their photo ID when they request and return an absentee ballot. States would also have to share voter rolls with the Department of Homeland Security to verify citizenship.

Election officials would conduct regular reviews to remove noncitizens from the rolls. If signed into law, the rules would take effect right away.

New version goes further than original

This bill builds on the original SAVE Act, which the House passed in April 2025 by a vote of 220-208. That earlier version drew support from four Democrats, compared to just one this time.

The key difference is scope. The original bill required proof of citizenship to register but did not require photo ID at the polls. The new version adds photo ID rules for both in-person and mail-in voting.

The original bill stalled in the Senate and never got a floor vote.

Republicans say it prevents fraud

Republicans say the bill makes sure only U.S. citizens vote in federal elections. Polls back the general idea.

A Pew Research survey found 83 percent of Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote. Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, the bill’s lead sponsor, called it “common-sense legislation.”

Some Republicans argue the measure will help restore public trust in elections after years of debate over voting rules.

The broad public support for voter ID gives the party a strong talking point as the bill heads to the Senate.

Democrats call it voter suppression

Democrats see the bill very differently. They say it would make voting harder for millions of eligible Americans.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries accused Republicans of adopting voter suppression as a political strategy. Even some Democrats who backed the original SAVE Act opposed this version.

Reps. Jared Golden and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez both voted yes last time and no this time.

Golden said the two bills “are not even close to the same legislation.” The added ID requirements for mail-in voting drove much of the opposition.

Noncitizen voting is already illegal

Federal law has banned noncitizens from voting in federal elections since 1996. Anyone who registers must swear under penalty of perjury that they are a U.S. citizen.

The penalties are steep. Noncitizens who vote can face fines, up to five years in prison, and deportation.

They can also lose the ability to ever become U.S. citizens.

Democrats point to these existing laws as evidence that the bill solves a problem that barely exists.

Research shows noncitizen voting is rare

Multiple audits and studies have found that noncitizen voting happens in very small numbers. A 2025 Michigan audit turned up 16 credible cases out of 5.7 million votes cast in the 2024 election.

Georgia reviewed 8.2 million registered voters and found just 20 noncitizens on the rolls, nine of whom had voted.

A Brennan Center study of 42 jurisdictions covering 23.5 million votes in 2016 found only about 30 suspected cases referred for investigation.

Millions of citizens lack required documents

About 21 million voting-age citizens do not have ready access to proof-of-citizenship documents, according to a national survey by the Brennan Center, VoteRiders, and the University of Maryland.

Roughly 3.8 million citizens lack these documents entirely, often because they were lost, destroyed, or stolen. Nearly half of Americans do not have a U.S. passport.

The survey also found that citizens of color are more likely than white citizens to lack the required paperwork, which fuels Democratic concerns about the bill’s impact.

Election officials warn of chaos

State primaries begin next month, and critics say there is not enough time to put new rules in place. Election officials warn that the bill adds major new duties with no additional funding.

States that automatically send mail-in ballots to all voters would need to overhaul their systems.

Karen Brinson Bell of the nonpartisan consulting firm Advance Elections said the bill adds “numerous requirements with no resources to carry them out.”

The tight timeline has raised alarm among officials in both parties.

Bill faces tough path in the Senate

The Senate requires 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, and Republicans hold 53 seats.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune supports the bill but said there are nowhere near enough votes to eliminate the filibuster. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer vowed to block the bill, calling it dead on arrival.

Even some Republicans oppose it. Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said the Constitution gives states authority over elections.

Getting seven Democrats to cross party lines looks unlikely.

Some Republicans push to change Senate rules

Sen. Mike Lee of Utah wants to bring back the talking filibuster, which would force opponents to physically speak on the Senate floor to block the bill.

Nearly 100 conservative leaders signed a letter urging Thune to use this approach.

But Thune has pushed back, warning it would tie up the Senate floor and delay other priorities like tax reform and spending bills.

Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina said the votes to change filibuster rules simply are not there.

What happens next

The bill now moves to the Senate, where its future is far from clear.

Some Republicans have floated attaching it to must-pass spending legislation as a way around the filibuster. Trump has called on Republicans to fight for the bill and has suggested nationalizing elections.

If the Senate does not pass the bill, the 2026 midterm elections in November would proceed under current state voting rules. The next few months will determine whether these new requirements become law.

This article was created with AI assistance and human editing.

Read more from this brand:

• Senate Passes $174B Spending Package — But ICE Shooting Throws DHS Funding Into Doubt
• House Passes Health Bill as 22 Million Americans Brace for Premium Spike
• 22 Million Americans Face Premium Shock as Congress Leaves Without Health Care Deal