The fight over teen safety and Meta social media addiction moves into U.S. court

Meta faces its biggest youth safety test

Meta is back in a courtroom, and the stakes are unusually high. A federal trial began on August 18 in Oakland, California. The states allege that Meta deliberately designed features on Facebook and Instagram to encourage compulsive use among children and teenagers while misleading consumers about platform safety.

Meta denies those allegations. The company says it has invested heavily in teen safety tools and argues the states have not proved that its platforms caused the harms they describe.

Meta faces claims from 29 states

All 29 states are pursuing federal claims alleging that Meta violated children’s privacy protections under COPPA by improperly collecting data from users under 13.

California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey are also jointly trying their separate state consumer-protection claims, which accuse Meta of misleading the public about youth safety and using platform features designed to keep young users engaged.

Meta’s design choices take center stage

Meta’s product design is a major focus of the case. The states argue that features such as endless scrolling, notifications, and other engagement tools kept young users returning for longer periods.

Meta disputes the idea that those features were built to addict teens. Its lawyers are expected to emphasize safety measures, parental controls, age-related protections, and the broader benefits young users can get from connecting online.

An unusual jury will advise the judge

This trial has an uncommon setup. Eight jurors will hear the evidence, deliberate, and return an advisory verdict, but Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers is not legally bound to follow it.

The advisory jury includes five women and three men, and the trial is expected to run for several weeks before the judge ultimately decides what happens next.

Little-known fact: Advisory juries are allowed in some federal civil cases, but the judge can accept or reject their findings.

Children’s privacy is another major issue

The lawsuit is not only about screen time or app design. The states also accuse Meta of violating the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act by collecting information from users under 13.

COPPA generally requires covered online services to obtain verifiable parental consent before collecting personal information from children under 13. Meta disputes the states’ claims and says age verification remains a difficult challenge across the internet, not just on its platforms.

Fun fact: COPPA has been part of U.S. federal law since 1998 and focuses on online privacy protections for children under 13.

The possible penalties are enormous

No final penalty amount has been set, but the numbers being discussed are enormous. Meta says the four states’ penalty calculations could expose the company to as much as $1.4 trillion if they prevail, although the attorneys general have not formally demanded that amount.

At a hearing shortly before trial, attorneys for the states said the ultimate penalty could instead be closer to $200 billion, showing how uncertain the financial exposure remains.

States also want changes to the apps

Money is only one part of what the states want. California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey are asking the judge to consider changes affecting how Meta’s platforms operate for younger users.

Meta argues that sweeping nationwide changes would go too far and says it has already introduced protections designed specifically for teens and families.

Zuckerberg may take the witness stand

Some of Meta’s most recognizable leaders are expected to testify. CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram chief Adam Mosseri are among the executives likely to appear during the multiweek proceedings.

The states are expected to question company leaders about platform design, youth engagement, internal research, and Meta’s response to safety concerns. At the same time, Meta will use executive testimony to defend its decisions and safety record.

Teen social media use remains widespread

The case matters partly because social media is deeply woven into teenage life. Pew Research Center reported in 2025 that 63% of U.S. teens used TikTok, 61% used Instagram, and 55% used Snapchat.

Research on teens and social media remains mixed and highly dependent on how platforms are used, with studies and surveys documenting benefits such as connection alongside concerns about distraction, harassment, excessive use, and mental health.

Earlier cases add pressure on Meta

Meta has already lost other recent youth-safety cases, including a California jury trial in which Meta and YouTube were found liable and a New Mexico case that resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties and court-ordered remedies. Meta has challenged or plans to appeal those outcomes.

Those earlier decisions do not determine what happens in Oakland because each case involves different laws, evidence, and plaintiffs. Still, they increase attention on the federal trial and may shape how lawyers approach evidence, witnesses, and proposed safety changes.

Meta says the states have not proved harm

Meta’s defense centers on a basic argument: allegations are not the same as proof. The company says the states have not shown that specific platform features misled residents or directly caused the harms claimed.

The states counter that internal decisions and design choices tell a different story about priorities inside the company.

The ruling could reach beyond Meta

A major ruling against Meta could influence how lawyers, regulators, and courts approach similar cases against other social media companies, although it would not automatically determine those cases. Other social media companies are facing lawsuits that raise similar questions about engagement features, children’s data, and protections for younger users.

A Meta victory could also strengthen arguments that existing safety measures and current evidence are not enough to establish liability. Either way, the Oakland case is being watched as a major test for the wider technology industry.

For another social media update tied to teen safety, platform accountability, and state enforcement, see why Florida’s TikTok lawsuit has become a statewide test.

The final decision may take time

Opening statements are only the beginning. The trial is expected to last roughly six to eight weeks, with testimony, internal records, expert evidence, and arguments from both sides still ahead.

Because the jury is advisory, Judge Rogers will ultimately decide liability and any remedies. That means the fight over teen safety, platform design, privacy, and responsibility may continue well beyond the final day of testimony.

For another social media update tied to teen safety, phone-based protections, and platform responsibility, see why Illinois is pushing a new approach that could draw industry resistance.

Should parents have more power to challenge Meta when teen safety concerns reach court? Share your thoughts and drop a comment.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Read More From This Brand:

• Lawmakers in California advance a plan to limit social media for users under 16
• Legal battle expands as New Mexico seeks tighter controls on social media algorithms
• California bill to limit social media access for children under 16 gains traction in the legislature