The Supreme Court just put a hard limit on what presidents can do with trade

Court says presidents can’t impose tariffs alone

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Feb. 20 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the president the power to impose tariffs.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices Gorsuch, Barrett, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh dissented.

The decision wiped out the legal basis for Trump’s tariffs on dozens of countries and his levies tied to fentanyl emergencies on Canada, China, and Mexico.

Tariffs on steel, aluminum, and autos under other laws remain in place.

Democrats say families overpaid about $1,700

Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee released a report showing American families paid an average of roughly $1,745 in tariff costs between February 2025 and January 2026.

The committee used Treasury Department revenue data and Congressional Budget Office estimates to figure out how much shoppers actually bore. The total cost to consumers topped an estimated $231 billion.

Studies from Yale’s Budget Lab and Harvard Business School landed in a similar range, between about $1,400 and $1,751 per household each year.

Pritzker sends the White House an invoice

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker didn’t wait around. He sent the White House a letter demanding $1,700 for each of the state’s roughly 5.1 million households, a total of nearly $8.7 billion.

The letter was styled as an itemized invoice marked “past due” and “delinquent.” Pritzker wrote that the tariffs drove up grocery prices and hurt farmers.

He warned Illinois would pursue more legal action if the administration didn’t comply. His gubernatorial campaign released the letter publicly.

Other Democratic leaders pile on

Pritzker wasn’t alone. California Gov. Gavin Newsom demanded refunds “with interest,” calling the tariffs an illegal cash grab. Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear said families deserved their money back.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren said the American people paid for the tariffs and should be repaid. Nevada Treasurer Zach Conine submitted a $2.1 billion payment request to the federal government on behalf of his state.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul called the tariffs an unlawful backdoor tax but didn’t name a specific dollar amount.

Refund checks to families face a big problem

Here’s the catch: tariffs aren’t paid by shoppers. Importers pay them at the border to U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Any refunds from this ruling would legally go to those companies, not directly to households. Importers often pass tariff costs to retailers, who then raise prices for consumers.

There’s no legal path in the ruling for the government to mail refund checks to families.

The Democratic governors’ demands highlight what families paid, but trade law experts say that’s not how refunds actually work.

White House fights back on refund push

Trump said he expects the refund fight to drag on in court for the next two years. A White House spokesman dismissed Pritzker’s invoice, accusing him of chasing headlines.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the administration would use other legal tools to keep tariff revenue “virtually unchanged in 2026.”

Trump went further, calling the justices who ruled against him a “disgrace to our nation” and saying he felt ashamed of some he had appointed.

Trump signs new tariffs within hours

The ruling didn’t slow things down for long. Hours after the decision, Trump signed an executive order imposing a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.

The next day, he raised the rate to 15%, the maximum that the law allows. Section 122 tariffs are temporary and expire after 150 days without congressional approval.

The law was designed for balance-of-payments emergencies and had never been used before. Some trade experts question whether it legally applies here.

Businesses line up for billions in refunds

The Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates importers could seek up to $175 billion in refunds. The Supreme Court didn’t spell out a refund process, leaving that to lower courts and Customs and Border Protection.

Importers generally have 180 days after goods are finalized to protest and request their money back.

Hundreds of companies, including Costco, parts of the Toyota Group, and Revlon, had already filed lawsuits to preserve refund claims before the ruling came down.

Trade lawyers say companies will likely get paid, but the process could take a while.

Republicans split over the decision

The ruling divided the GOP. Vice President JD Vance called it “lawlessness from the Court” and said the president would use other tariff powers.

But Sen. Mitch McConnell praised the decision, saying Congress’s role in trade policy is “not an inconvenience to avoid.”

Sen. Rand Paul called it a defense of the republic, saying tariffs are taxes that belong to Congress. House Speaker Mike Johnson said Congress and the administration would find the best path forward.

Rep. Don Bacon signaled Trump’s new Section 122 order could face a congressional challenge.

Most Americans side with the court

A YouGov survey released the same day found 60% of U.S. adults approved of the ruling. Support broke down along party lines: 88% of Democrats backed the decision, and 63% of independents agreed.

Republicans were split, with 43% disapproving and 30% approving. About 17% of all respondents said they were unsure.

The poll suggests broad public support for the idea that Congress, not the president, should control tariff power.

New tariffs and price hikes loom ahead

The new 15% Section 122 tariffs take effect on Feb. 24 and could last up to 150 days.

The administration plans to launch investigations under Section 301 and Section 232 to build longer-term tariffs, a process that could stretch for months.

Tariffs on steel, aluminum, autos, semiconductors, and copper stay in place under separate laws. The Yale Budget Lab estimates the remaining tariffs still mean about a 0.6% bump in consumer prices in the short run.

Prices may not drop anytime soon

Even with the ruling, shoppers might not feel relief right away.

Companies like Walmart have already raised prices, and there’s no guarantee they’ll roll those back. The political fight over tariffs and refunds is expected to be a major issue heading into the 2026 midterm elections.

Meanwhile, the core question the court answered is simple: the power to tax imports belongs to Congress, not the president. IEEPA, passed in 1977, gives broad emergency economic powers but never mentions tariffs.

No previous president had read the law that way.

Case took a long road to the Supreme Court

The case started as Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and was combined with Trump v. V.O.S. Selections. The Court of International Trade first struck down the tariffs in May 2025.

The Federal Circuit upheld that decision in August 2025 before the Supreme Court took it up. The ruling doesn’t stop Congress from passing tariff legislation on its own if it chooses to.

For now, the fight moves to lower courts, refund claims, and the 2026 campaign trail.

This article was created with AI assistance and human editing.

Read more from this brand:

• US Small Businesses Paying $25,000 Extra a Month Due to Tariffs
• Americans pay nearly 90% of tariff costs, new study finds
• Trump is ‘very proud’ of US economy – many Americans aren’t so happy