Trump calls it “brilliant” if companies skip tariff refunds

Donald Trump tariff refunds policy explained

Donald Trump said on April 21, 2026, that he would “remember” companies that choose not to seek refunds on tariffs later ruled illegal. The comments came one day after U.S. Customs and Border Protection opened an electronic system to process refund claims.

The tariffs were imposed under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act. On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs.

About $166 billion in collected tariffs is subject to refunds. The refund process has created a complex decision for businesses weighing financial recovery, administrative steps, timing, and political risk.

Supreme Court ruling voids tariffs

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in February 2026 that tariffs imposed under emergency powers were unlawful. The decision invalidated duties applied to imports from nearly every country.

The ruling confirmed that the administration exceeded its authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The court did not provide clear instructions on how refunds should be handled.

This gap forced lower courts and federal agencies to establish a repayment process. The ruling set up one of the largest refund efforts in U.S. history, involving more than $160 billion.

About $166 billion in tariffs eligible for refunds

More than 330,000 importers paid about $166 billion in IEEPA tariff deposits or payments across more than 53 million entries. Those payments are now subject to the federal refund process.

The scale of repayment makes it one of the largest tariff refund efforts in recent U.S. history. Businesses across retail, logistics, manufacturing, and other import-heavy sectors are affected.

The total includes IEEPA duties collected on affected imports in 2025 and 2026. The volume of claims is expected to create a complex processing challenge for CBP and eligible importers.

CBP launches CAPE refund portal

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency launched the CAPE system to process refund applications. The portal began accepting electronic submissions in April 2026.

Importers or authorized brokers can file claims for tariffs paid. Early operations show the platform is working without major technical disruptions.

Initial eligibility focuses on entries finalized within the past 80 days or those not fully processed. The phased rollout is designed to manage the expected surge in claims.

Trump signals preference against refunds

Donald Trump said companies that do not seek refunds would be viewed favorably. He described that decision as “brilliant” during a CNBC interview.

He added that he would “remember” companies that avoid filing claims. The remarks suggest informal incentives, though no official policy has been announced.

Trump also criticized the Supreme Court ruling, saying it forced the government to return billions. His comments added political pressure to a legal and financial process.

Apple and Amazon avoid early refund action

Apple and Amazon had not yet sought tariff refunds immediately after the CAPE portal opened in April 2026, Reuters reported. Trump said he was pleased by reports that Apple, Amazon, and some other large companies had not yet requested refunds.

Target and Walmart also had not joined companies such as Costco, FedEx, and Mondelez in suing the U.S. government to preserve refund rights. Those companies could still submit requests through the CBP portal.

Trade experts expect many large importers to eventually seek refunds because of the large sums involved and the financial impact of the tariffs.

Some companies pursue legal action

Several companies took immediate legal steps to secure their right to refunds. Costco, FedEx, and Mondelez filed lawsuits in the U.S. Court of International Trade.

More than 1,000 companies have filed similar cases to preserve their eligibility for refunds. These lawsuits are designed to ensure access to funds if the federal government challenges or delays repayment.

This legal activity reflects the scale of the issue and the financial stakes involved. Some companies are prioritizing legal certainty, while others are waiting for more clarity before taking action.

Retailers expect major financial impact

Tariffs imposed under the earlier policy significantly increased costs for many U.S. importers. Apple disclosed that tariffs raised its costs by about $3.3 billion last year.

Levi Strauss has estimated that it paid about $80 million under the IEEPA tariffs, but it had not recognized an asset related to a potential refund. Gap said tariffs were expected to affect margins, while its annual targets did not account for the IEEPA ruling.

Many companies have not fully reflected potential refunds in forecasts because timing, eligibility, and processing remain uncertain.

Refund processing may take months

Refund payments are generally expected within 60 to 90 days after CBP accepts valid claims. Each claim must be processed and validated before funds are released.

The system must handle claims tied to more than 330,000 importers and more than 53 million entries, making the refund effort unusually large and complex.

Processing timelines may also be affected by legal challenges, administrative reviews, system capacity, and future appeals. Companies are preparing for delays as they incorporate potential refunds into financial planning.

Court introduces temporary delay

Richard Eaton issued a temporary stay on the refund process shortly after it began. The order requires the government to provide a progress update by April 28, 2026.

The stay followed a request from customs bond providers seeking inclusion in the refund system. These providers guarantee tariff payments but were not initially covered under the CAPE process.

Despite the stay, the CAPE portal continues to accept refund applications. This creates a situation where filings can proceed, but final payment timelines remain uncertain.

Eligibility rules limit who can file

Only importers of record or their authorized customs brokers can submit refund claims. These are the parties that originally paid the tariffs to the U.S. government.

Each submission must include detailed documentation, such as import records, payment data, and shipment details. This requirement ensures accuracy but increases businesses’ administrative workload.

Claims that do not meet initial eligibility criteria are flagged by the system and may be rejected or delayed. The structured review process is designed to manage volume but may slow access to refunds for some applicants.

New tariffs may replace old ones

Donald Trump said new tariffs could be introduced under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to replace the invalidated measures. This approach follows a more traditional trade enforcement process.

Section 301 actions require investigations and can involve public comment and hearing procedures before remedies are imposed. That makes the process more complex and time-consuming than emergency-power tariffs.

The new tariffs are not expected before July 2026. The gap between policies leaves businesses uncertain about future costs, pricing strategies, and long-term supply chain planning.

Curious what’s driving the sudden market split? Learn how rising energy shortages and renewed warnings on Iran are influencing oil and equities.

Companies face strategic decision on refunds

Companies must decide whether and when to file for tariff refunds. The decision involves balancing immediate financial recovery with uncertainty around timing, eligibility, administrative complexity, and possible political pressure.

Refunds could provide significant financial benefits, especially for companies that paid large IEEPA tariffs. Some companies have already disclosed tariff costs or potential refund exposure, while others are still weighing when and how to file.

Industry advisors expect many eligible companies will eventually seek refunds. The size of the potential refund pool and the scale of tariffs paid make participation likely across multiple sectors.

Wondering how Florida is helping patients fight doctor overcharges? See how the new rule gives patients more power to challenge medical bills.

Stay informed on how trade policies impact major companies and the economy. Follow for more data-driven breakdowns that explain the real numbers behind the headlines.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Read More From This Brand:

• Indiana now requires drivers to report car color changes
• Budget concerns rise after healthcare program overruns expectations
• Global firms discontinue U.S. business ties over ICE controversy