Claims of fake sign-ins throw new chaos into Washington’s tax showdown

When a sign-in list sparks chaos

If you’ve ever clicked “RSVP” online, you know lists can get messy fast. Now, Washington lawmakers are dealing with a mess on a much bigger stage. A public sign-in page became part of a major tax fight.

The issue is a proposed “millionaires tax” bill moving through Olympia. Supporters say the opposition list was padded with duplicates and fake entries. That claim has triggered reviews and an investigation.

What the bill is trying to do

The bill at the center is Senate Bill 6346. It proposes a 9.9% tax on taxable personal income above $1 million. It is one of the biggest revenue ideas Washington has debated in years.

The proposal already passed the state Senate. It then moved to the House, where a Finance Committee hearing was scheduled. That’s the hearing where the sign-in numbers exploded.

How Washington’s sign-ins work

Washington’s Legislature allows people to sign in as “pro,” “con,” or “other” for many hearings. It’s a fast way to show interest, even if you do not testify. Lawmakers and the public can see the totals.

But a sign-in system is not the same as a verified poll. It can show energy and organizing, not perfect headcounts. That difference is now a big part of the story.

The eye-popping “con” totals

Ahead of the House hearing, reports described more than 100,000 “con” sign-ins. Supporters of the tax argued the number looked suspicious. They said the list included duplicates and apparent impersonations.

Opponents pointed to the raw totals as proof that the bill is unpopular. That made the sign-in list feel like a scoreboard. And that’s why the fraud claims hit like a bomb.

Little-known fact: Invest in Washington Now alleged tens of thousands of duplicates and said more than 100 “con” sign-ins were confirmed as fraudulent ahead of the House Finance hearing.

The group making the fraud claims

A progressive revenue group called Invest in Washington Now raised the alarm. It said it found tens of thousands of duplicate entries tied to hearings on SB 6346. It also said it confirmed over 100 “con” sign-ins as fraudulent.

The group shared its claims in a news release and a press event. It also urged state officials to investigate what happened and who did it. That request moved quickly into the Capitol’s workflow.

The duplicates were not “a few”

Supporters claimed the duplicates were in the tens of thousands. One breakdown cited more than 15,000 “con” duplicates tied to a Senate hearing and more than 22,000 tied to the House hearing list. That kind of scale is what triggered a deeper review.

FOX 13 reported lawmakers also flagged duplicates in their own early review. Their preliminary numbers described over 19,000 duplicate records. That helped push the issue from rumor to formal concern.

The impersonation claims got personal

This wasn’t only about repeated names. Some people said their names appeared as “con” without permission. One example reported was Sen. Victoria Hunt, a co-sponsor of the bill.

Reports also named other prominent figures who said they were against the bill. That included former Rep. Derek Kilmer and union leaders who back the tax. These claims raised the stakes from “duplicates” to “identity misuse.”

Why CAPTCHA didn’t end the problem

The sign-in page uses a CAPTCHA to slow bots. Still, supporters argued the pattern looked automated. They pointed out many repeated entries appearing within seconds.

CAPTCHA can reduce basic bot spam, but it is not a full identity check. If someone types in your name and address, the form may accept it. That’s why lawmakers are now talking about system upgrades.

What lawmakers say they found so far

During the House Finance Committee hearing, leaders publicly flagged concerns about the sign-in process. FOX 13 reported that lawmakers identified over 19,000 duplicate records and more than 200 potentially fraudulent sign-ins in an initial review. That review was described as preliminary.

Lawmakers from both parties said the system matters for public participation. They also said sorting it out could take time. The key point is this is now an official issue, not just a social media fight.

The investigation steps underway

The House Chief Clerk’s office said it is investigating the incident. It also said it plans future system improvements to prevent abuse. That’s a rare public warning about the process itself.

On the Senate side, Democrats said their IT team is also reviewing the allegations. Multiple reviews matter because the sign-in tools connect to official legislative records. When records are questioned, trust takes a hit.

Why the sign-ins matter in Olympia

In theory, lawmakers consider testimony, data, and budgetary impacts. In practice, huge sign-in totals can shape headlines and talking points. They can also influence how “popular” a bill feels.

That’s why both sides talk about the numbers. Supporters say inflated totals can mislead the public. Opponents say even adjusted numbers still show major pushback. The truth will depend on what the investigation confirms.

Where the bill stands right now

SB 6346’s official bill history shows it passed the Senate 27–22. It then moved to the House Finance Committee. The hearing date and next steps are listed on the Legislature’s site.

That timeline matters because it explains why the sign-in rush happened. High-stakes bills often trigger mass sign-in campaigns. This time, the rush came with allegations of tampering as well.

If proof of citizenship sounds simple on paper, the real question is how it works in real life. Read how the SAVE Act push raises a bigger question than election security.

The bigger lesson about online civic tools

Online sign-in systems are meant to make democracy easier. But any open form can be gamed without strong identity verification. Lawmakers are now being forced to think like cybersecurity teams.

Whatever you think about the tax, the process issue is separate. People want their names to mean something in public records. That’s why upgrades, audits, and clear rules will likely be part of the next chapter.

Next, explore why critics are saying that Washington’s new posture is sending a clear message to white nationalists.

What should lawmakers fix first, the sign-in system or the tax details, and why? Share your thoughts and your view in the comments.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Read More From This Brand:

• Jimmy Kimmel speaks out against ICE after deadly Minnesota shooting
• Young Americans Are Enlisting Again, Military Signs 160,000+ Recruits
• USDA Forcing 2,600 Employees to Leave Washington in Major Shakeup