Why Law Schools Still Teach the Case of Pepsi’s Fighter Jet Fiasco

He Sent Them $700,000 and Waited

In 1996, a Pepsi commercial showed a teenager landing a Harrier fighter jet at his high school. The screen flashed “7,000,000 Pepsi Points.”

Most people laughed. John Leonard, a 21-year-old business student in Seattle, saw an opportunity.

He found a loophole that let him buy the points for $700,000 instead of drinking millions of cans of Pepsi. He raised the money, sent the check, and demanded his jet.

Pepsi said no.

What followed became one of the most famous lawsuits in American history, and the reason it’s still taught in law schools today comes down to a question nobody at Pepsi thought they’d have to answer.

Pepsi Launches Its Biggest Campaign Ever

PepsiCo was losing ground to Coca-Cola in 1995. The company needed something big to win over younger customers.

In March 1996, Pepsi rolled out Pepsi Stuff, a loyalty program where customers collected points from product labels and traded them for merchandise. A leather jacket cost 1,450 points.

Sunglasses cost 175 points. A phone card cost 35 points.

The campaign was the largest promotional effort in Pepsi’s history.

Before launching nationally, Pepsi tested it in the Pacific Northwest from October 1995 to March 1996.

The Commercial Shows a Teenager Landing a Fighter Jet

The television spot opened on a suburban morning. A cocky teenager put on a Pepsi shirt, then a leather jacket, then sunglasses.

Each item appeared with its point value on screen. The narrator said the more Pepsi you drink, the more great stuff you get.

Then the scene shifted to a high school parking lot. A computer-generated Harrier jet landed next to the bike rack.

Wind from the engines stripped a teacher down to his underwear. The teenager climbed out of the cockpit holding a Pepsi.

The screen showed “Harrier Fighter 7,000,000 Pepsi Points. ” The commercial ended with the Pepsi logo and triumphant music.

Leonard Spots a Loophole in the Rules

John Leonard saw the commercial during the Pacific Northwest test run in early 1996. He knew Harrier jets from his interest in flying.

The planes were used in the Gulf War and could take off vertically while carrying 10,000 pounds of bombs. They cost about $33 million to build.

Leonard grabbed the Pepsi Stuff catalog to check the details. The catalog listed shirts, jackets, and mountain bikes.

No jet appeared anywhere. But Leonard found something else.

The rules said customers needed to submit 15 original Pepsi Points from labels, and the rest could be purchased for 10 cents each. He did the math.

Seven million points at 10 cents each came to $700,000. A $33 million jet for $700,000 looked like the deal of a lifetime.

He Convinces Investors to Fund the Plan

Leonard needed $700,000. He worked as a climbing guide and knew people with money.

He called his friend Todd Hoffman, who had made millions in mountaineering equipment. Leonard put together a business plan and researched case law on promotional advertisements.

Hoffman agreed to back him. They brought in three more investors.

Leonard drafted the order form himself. He wrote “1 Harrier Jet” in the item column and “7,000,000” in the total points column.

The check came from his lawyer’s account because he already had legal representation when he mailed it.

Pepsi Receives a Check for $700,008.50

On March 27, 1996, Leonard sent his package to Pepsi. It included 15 original Pepsi Points, the order form, and a check for $700,008.50.

The extra $8.50 covered shipping and handling. In an attached letter, Leonard stated the check was to purchase additional Pepsi Points for obtaining a new Harrier jet as advertised in the Pepsi Stuff commercial.

He waited for a response. Pepsi’s fulfillment house received the order on May 7, 1996.

They had no procedure for this. Nobody at Pepsi expected someone to actually try claiming the jet.

Pepsi Calls the Whole Thing a Joke

Pepsi rejected Leonard’s order and returned his check. The rejection letter said the Harrier jet was not part of the Pepsi Stuff collection.

The jet in the commercial was fanciful and included to create a humorous and entertaining ad. Pepsi apologized for any confusion and enclosed free product coupons.

Leonard’s lawyer wrote back on May 14. The response demanded Pepsi honor its commitment and make immediate arrangements to transfer the jet. If Pepsi didn’t respond within 10 business days, Leonard would file a lawsuit.

Raymond McGovern, a vice president at the advertising firm that created the commercial, replied that he found it hard to believe Leonard thought the offer was real. No reasonable person would agree with that analysis.

Leonard Sues for Breach of Contract

Leonard hired attorney Larry Schantz. They filed a lawsuit claiming Pepsi made a fraudulent offer and breached contract by refusing to honor it. Leonard insisted he wasn’t looking for publicity or a settlement.

He just wanted the plane. He told reporters he was simply trying to take Pepsi up on an offer the company made to the public.

Leonard argued that the commercial showed clear terms and he had accepted by tendering payment. He even claimed a federal judge couldn’t decide the case.

Instead, Leonard wanted a jury made up of members of the Pepsi Generation who would understand the ad was meant for them.

Pepsi Files Its Own Lawsuit First

On July 18, 1996, Pepsi beat Leonard to court. The company filed a declaratory judgment action in New York asking that Leonard’s claim be declared frivolous. Pepsi also demanded Leonard reimburse them for legal fees.

A Pepsi spokesman told CBS News that tens of millions of people saw the commercial, got the joke, and laughed. Leonard saw it, hired lawyers, and decided to sue.

Meanwhile, Pepsi kept airing the commercial but made changes. The company increased the points needed for the jet from 7 million to 700 million.

Later, they added the words “Just Kidding” below the price.

The Case Drags On for Three Years

The legal battle bounced between Florida and New York.

Leonard initially filed in Florida, but the case ended up in federal court in New York’s Southern District. Judge Kimba Wood presided.

Discovery dragged on. Leonard changed lawyers multiple times.

At one point, Michael Avenatti joined his legal team before leaving. The court ordered Leonard to pay $88,162 in Pepsi’s legal fees for discovery abuses and delays.

Leonard failed to pay but kept appealing. In February 1999, both sides agreed to drop their appeals and let the New York court decide.

Pepsi filed for summary judgment, asking the judge to rule without a trial.

Judge Wood Rules Against Leonard in 1999

On August 5, 1999, Judge Wood granted summary judgment to Pepsi. The ruling came down to contract law basics.

Advertisements are generally not offers, the judge explained. They’re invitations to negotiate.

For an ad to be an offer, it must be clear, definite, and explicit with nothing left open. The Pepsi commercial failed that test.

The jet wasn’t listed in the official catalog. The commercial didn’t explain how to accept the offer.

Most important, the judge said no objective person could reasonably conclude that Pepsi seriously intended to give away a $33 million military aircraft for $700,000. The scenario was absurd.

A teenager landing a fighter jet at school and blowing a teacher’s clothes off with jet exhaust was obviously a joke.

Leonard Loses Everything and Pepsi Never Cashes His Check

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld Judge Wood’s decision in a brief opinion. Leonard’s lawsuit was over.

He never got his jet. Pepsi never cashed his $700,000 check, so there was no fraud case either.

Leonard ended up owing Pepsi $88,162 in legal fees, though the company eventually agreed not to collect. Looking back years later, Leonard told reporters he understood why people called him an opportunist.

He admitted it was opportunistic, but he genuinely believed at the time he would get the jet.

By 2021, Leonard worked as a park ranger for the National Park Service and lived in Washington DC with his wife and kids.

The Case Becomes Famous in Law Schools

Leonard v. Pepsico is now one of the most taught cases in American contract law classes.

First-year law students across the country read Judge Wood’s opinion to learn about offers, acceptance, and the reasonable person standard.

The case illustrates how advertisements work legally and why outrageous promotional claims don’t create binding contracts.

Legal scholars praise the case for being relatable and entertaining while teaching fundamental principles. In 2022, Netflix released a four-part documentary called Pepsi, Where’s My Jet?

Leonard appeared in it alongside Todd Hoffman.

Twenty-five years after losing, Leonard still believes the offer was real, even if a federal judge disagreed.

This article was created with AI assistance and human editing.

Read more from this brand:

• Are women-only rides illegal? Male drivers take Uber and Lyft to court
• Campbell’s Forced to Deny 3D-Printed Chicken Rumors
• Trump Cuts Off Immigration From Developing Countries After DC Shooting